On 17 October 2024, a significant ruling was delivered by a 5-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India. This bench addressed the constitutional validity concerning a specific section of the Citizenship Act, 1955.
The Constitution Bench, in its majority decision, upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955. This section deals with specific provisions related to citizenship.
Section 6A was introduced into the Citizenship Act, 1955, by an amendment in 1985. It provides a special pathway for persons who entered India from specific territories (like Bangladesh) before a certain date to register as citizens of India. The constitutional challenge often centered on whether this special provision violated the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.
The 4:1 majority verdict signifies that the highest court of the land found the provisions contained within Section 6A to be constitutionally sound and valid. The single dissenting judge's opinion represents a differing legal perspective on the matter.
A person who advocates separation of the state from religious institutions is called a ______.
The Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution includes _______ languages.
The right of a person, party or nation to stop a certain decision or law is called ________
As on 2018, which is the world’s largest political party in terms of primary membership?
The Finance Commission in India is constituted by the _______ under article 280 of the Constitution.