On 17 October 2024, a significant ruling was delivered by a 5-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India. This bench addressed the constitutional validity concerning a specific section of the Citizenship Act, 1955.
The Constitution Bench, in its majority decision, upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955. This section deals with specific provisions related to citizenship.
Section 6A was introduced into the Citizenship Act, 1955, by an amendment in 1985. It provides a special pathway for persons who entered India from specific territories (like Bangladesh) before a certain date to register as citizens of India. The constitutional challenge often centered on whether this special provision violated the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.
The 4:1 majority verdict signifies that the highest court of the land found the provisions contained within Section 6A to be constitutionally sound and valid. The single dissenting judge's opinion represents a differing legal perspective on the matter.
In a recent judgement, the Supreme Court of India directed that every protected forest, national park and wildlife sanctuary across the country should have a mandatory eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) of a minimum of
Which one of the following Directive Principles was inserted by the Constitution (42 nd Amendment) Act, 1976?
A common High Court for two or more states can be established by:
Which one among the following is not a Fundamental Right under the Constitution of India?
The Central Vigilance Commission was established on the recommendation of which one of the following Committees?