All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Obtaining a high correlation coefficient between administering an established test and the new test to the same students at approximately the same time result in

The correct answer is Concurrent validity

Understanding Test Validity: Concurrent Validity Explained

Test validity is a crucial aspect of psychological and educational measurement. It refers to the extent to which a test measures what it is intended to measure. There are different types of validity, and the scenario described in the question directly relates to one of them.

Analyzing the Question Scenario

The question describes a specific situation:

  • A new test is developed.
  • An established, presumably valid, test already exists to measure the same or a related construct.
  • Both the new test and the established test are administered to the same group of students.
  • The administration happens "at approximately the same time".
  • A high correlation coefficient is found between the scores on the two tests.

We need to identify which type of validity is demonstrated by a high correlation in this specific context.

Exploring Types of Test Validity

Let's look at the types of validity mentioned in the options:

  1. Predictive validity: This assesses how well a test score predicts future performance on a related criterion. For example, how well a college admission test predicts a student's future college GPA. This doesn't fit the scenario because the tests are given concurrently, not the new test followed by a future outcome.
  2. Face validity: This is about whether a test *appears* to measure what it claims to measure, based on a superficial inspection by test-takers or observers. It's a subjective judgment and doesn't involve statistical correlation with another measure. This doesn't fit the scenario.
  3. Concurrent validity: This assesses how well a test correlates with a concurrently existing criterion or an established measure of the same construct. "Concurrently" means at roughly the same time. If a new test correlates highly with an already validated test given simultaneously, it suggests the new test is measuring something similar to the established test, thus demonstrating concurrent validity.
  4. Construct validity: This is a broader concept that assesses how well a test measures the theoretical construct it is designed to measure. It's an accumulation of evidence from various sources, including concurrent validity, predictive validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, etc. While concurrent validity evidence contributes to construct validity, the scenario specifically describes the evidence for concurrent validity.

Applying the Scenario to Concurrent Validity

The scenario perfectly matches the definition of concurrent validity:

  • We have a new test and an established test (criterion).
  • They are administered to the same group.
  • They are administered at approximately the same time.
  • A high correlation is found.

This high correlation indicates that the new test's scores are closely related to the scores on the established test, which is a current measure of the construct. Therefore, obtaining a high correlation coefficient under these conditions provides strong evidence for the concurrent validity of the new test.

Comparing Options

Let's summarize why the other options are not the primary result of this specific scenario:

  • Predictive validity requires measuring the criterion at a later point in time.
  • Face validity is a matter of appearance, not statistical correlation.
  • Construct validity is an overarching concept, and while this scenario contributes evidence to it, the direct type of validity demonstrated by correlating with a concurrent established measure is concurrent validity.
Type of Validity What it Measures Relationship to Scenario
Predictive Validity How well a test predicts future performance. Criterion measured LATER than the test. Not the scenario.
Face Validity Whether a test looks like it measures the construct (subjective). Based on appearance, not correlation. Not the scenario.
Concurrent Validity How well a test correlates with a criterion measured at the SAME time. Matches the scenario exactly (new test vs. established test concurrently).
Construct Validity How well a test measures the theoretical construct (overall evidence). Concurrent validity evidence CONTRIBUTES to construct validity, but the scenario is the specific definition of concurrent validity.

Based on the analysis, obtaining a high correlation coefficient between a new test and an established test administered at approximately the same time results in evidence for concurrent validity.

Conclusion on Concurrent Validity Evidence

The high correlation between the new test and the established test administered concurrently is a direct indicator of concurrent validity. This suggests that the new test is capturing the same underlying abilities or traits as the established measure at that particular point in time.

Revision Table: Key Validity Concepts

Validity Type Description When Criterion is Measured
Predictive Validity Test score predicts future criterion performance. Future (after the test).
Concurrent Validity Test score correlates with current criterion performance or an established measure. Present (at the same time as the test).
Face Validity Test appears relevant and plausible to test-takers. Subjective judgment.
Construct Validity Test measures the intended theoretical construct. Accumulation of evidence (including predictive and concurrent).

Additional Information on Test Validation

Test validation is an ongoing process, not a single event. Evidence for different types of validity is collected to build a comprehensive understanding of what a test measures and how well it does so. High concurrent validity is often sought when introducing a new test intended to be a substitute for an existing, perhaps longer or more expensive, test. It provides initial confidence that the new test is measuring the construct similarly to established methods.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Steps of Research

  1. _______ is a prediction stated in a way that allows it to be tested.

  2. The correct sequence of the steps in the survey research process is

    (i) Delimit sample

    (ii) Send questionnaire

    (iii) Conduct Pilot study

    (iv) Analyze result and prepare report

    (v) Write covering letter

    (vi) Determine objectives

    (vii) Follow up

    (viii) Construct questionnaire

    Choose the correct answer from the code given below:

  3. The correct sequence of the steps in the scientific method of problem solving is

    (i) Gathering the data

    (ii) Analyzing and interpreting results

    (iii) Developing the problem

    (iv) Formulating the hypothesis

    Choose the correct answer from the code given below:

  4. Arrange in proper sequence the basic steps of conducting a Randomized controlled trials for treatment and prevention of disease
    A. Randomization
    B. Manipulation or Intervention
    C. Drawing up a protocol
    D. Selecting Reference and Population for trial
    E. Follow-up and assessment of outcome
    Choose the correct answer from the options given below
  5. Identify the correct sequential order of steps for developing a sample design
    A. Parameters of Interest
    B. Budgetary Constraint
    C. Type of Universe & Sampling Unit
    D. Sampling Procedure
    E. Source list & Size of Sample
    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App