Obtaining a high correlation coefficient between administering an established test and the new test to the same students at approximately the same time result in
Test validity is a crucial aspect of psychological and educational measurement. It refers to the extent to which a test measures what it is intended to measure. There are different types of validity, and the scenario described in the question directly relates to one of them.
The question describes a specific situation:
We need to identify which type of validity is demonstrated by a high correlation in this specific context.
Let's look at the types of validity mentioned in the options:
The scenario perfectly matches the definition of concurrent validity:
This high correlation indicates that the new test's scores are closely related to the scores on the established test, which is a current measure of the construct. Therefore, obtaining a high correlation coefficient under these conditions provides strong evidence for the concurrent validity of the new test.
Let's summarize why the other options are not the primary result of this specific scenario:
| Type of Validity | What it Measures | Relationship to Scenario |
|---|---|---|
| Predictive Validity | How well a test predicts future performance. | Criterion measured LATER than the test. Not the scenario. |
| Face Validity | Whether a test looks like it measures the construct (subjective). | Based on appearance, not correlation. Not the scenario. |
| Concurrent Validity | How well a test correlates with a criterion measured at the SAME time. | Matches the scenario exactly (new test vs. established test concurrently). |
| Construct Validity | How well a test measures the theoretical construct (overall evidence). | Concurrent validity evidence CONTRIBUTES to construct validity, but the scenario is the specific definition of concurrent validity. |
Based on the analysis, obtaining a high correlation coefficient between a new test and an established test administered at approximately the same time results in evidence for concurrent validity.
The high correlation between the new test and the established test administered concurrently is a direct indicator of concurrent validity. This suggests that the new test is capturing the same underlying abilities or traits as the established measure at that particular point in time.
| Validity Type | Description | When Criterion is Measured |
|---|---|---|
| Predictive Validity | Test score predicts future criterion performance. | Future (after the test). |
| Concurrent Validity | Test score correlates with current criterion performance or an established measure. | Present (at the same time as the test). |
| Face Validity | Test appears relevant and plausible to test-takers. | Subjective judgment. |
| Construct Validity | Test measures the intended theoretical construct. | Accumulation of evidence (including predictive and concurrent). |
Test validation is an ongoing process, not a single event. Evidence for different types of validity is collected to build a comprehensive understanding of what a test measures and how well it does so. High concurrent validity is often sought when introducing a new test intended to be a substitute for an existing, perhaps longer or more expensive, test. It provides initial confidence that the new test is measuring the construct similarly to established methods.
_______ is a prediction stated in a way that allows it to be tested.
The correct sequence of the steps in the survey research process is
(i) Delimit sample
(ii) Send questionnaire
(iii) Conduct Pilot study
(iv) Analyze result and prepare report
(v) Write covering letter
(vi) Determine objectives
(vii) Follow up
(viii) Construct questionnaire
Choose the correct answer from the code given below:
The correct sequence of the steps in the scientific method of problem solving is
(i) Gathering the data
(ii) Analyzing and interpreting results
(iii) Developing the problem
(iv) Formulating the hypothesis
Choose the correct answer from the code given below: