Match List I with List II LIST I (Concept) LIST II (Author/Thinker) A. Fragmentation in the coalition dominant interests I. Rajni Kothari B. Second dominant party system II. Pranab Bardhan C. Parties of Pressure III. Subrata Mitra and Iivanta Schotlli D. Ethnic Parties IV. Kanchan Chandra Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
A - II, B - III, C - I, D - IV
Matching Political Science Concepts and Authors
This question asks us to match specific political concepts related to parties, coalitions, and dominant interests with the authors or thinkers who developed or significantly discussed these concepts in the context of political science, often concerning India.
Let's analyze each concept and its corresponding author based on the provided correct answer:
| List I (Concept) | List II (Author/Thinker) | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| A. Fragmentation in the coalition dominant interests | II. Pranab Bardhan | Pranab Bardhan, an economist and political scientist, discussed the concept of 'coalition of dominant proprietary classes' in India and how fragmentation within this coalition affects policy and development. His work often highlights how conflicting interests among different dominant groups (industrialists, rich farmers, professionals) lead to policy drift and inefficient governance. |
| B. Second dominant party system | III. Subrata Mitra and Iivanta Schotlli | While Rajni Kothari is famous for the 'Congress System' (the first dominant party system), subsequent scholars have analyzed later phases of Indian politics. Subrata Mitra and Iivanta Schotlli are associated with analyzing the changes in India's party system, including periods that could be characterized as a 'second dominant party system' or shifts away from the earlier Congress dominance towards new forms of multi-party competition and coalition governments. |
| C. Parties of Pressure | I. Rajni Kothari | Rajni Kothari, in his seminal work on the 'Congress System', described how the dominant Congress party encompassed diverse groups and interests. Within this system, various factions and interest groups operated as 'parties of pressure' within the large Congress umbrella, influencing policy from within rather than forming separate opposition parties. |
| D. Ethnic Parties | IV. Kanchan Chandra | Kanchan Chandra is a prominent political scientist known for her extensive work on ethnicity, identity, and political parties, particularly in India. Her research focuses on how ethnic identities shape party formation, electoral strategies, and political competition, providing theoretical frameworks for understanding the role of ethnic parties in diverse democracies. |
Based on this analysis, the correct matching is A - II, B - III, C - I, D - IV.
Revision Table: Matching Political Science Thinkers and Ideas
| Concept (List I) | Author/Thinker (List II) |
|---|---|
| Fragmentation in the coalition dominant interests | Pranab Bardhan |
| Second dominant party system | Subrata Mitra and Iivanta Schotlli |
| Parties of Pressure | Rajni Kothari |
| Ethnic Parties | Kanchan Chandra |
Additional Information on Political Concepts and Authors
Understanding these concepts provides insight into the evolution of India's political system:
- Pranab Bardhan's Coalition of Dominant Interests: This concept helps explain the difficulties in implementing cohesive economic reforms in India, as policies often have to appease conflicting interests within the powerful elite groups.
- Rajni Kothari's Congress System: This describes the period (roughly 1950s-1960s) where the Congress Party was overwhelmingly dominant but also internally diverse, acting as a system where opposition operated both outside and inside the ruling party. 'Parties of Pressure' highlights the internal dynamics of this system.
- Second Dominant Party System: This term might refer to different interpretations of India's party landscape post-Congress dominance, possibly involving periods where a different party or a stable coalition led by one party held significant power, or it could represent the changing nature of dominance itself. Subrata Mitra and Iivanta Schotlli's work contributes to the understanding of these later party system dynamics.
- Kanchan Chandra on Ethnic Politics: Her research is crucial for understanding how caste, religion, and other forms of ethnic identity become bases for political mobilization and party formation, significantly impacting electoral outcomes and social dynamics in countries like India.
Important Questions from Miscellaneous
A stone is thrown horizontally from the top of a 20 m high building with a speed of 12 m/s. It hits the ground at a distance R from the building. Taking g = 10 m/s2 and neglecting air resistance will give :
A sphere of volume V is made of a material with lower density than water. While on Earth, it floats on water with its volume f1V (f1 < 1) submerged. On the other hand, on a spaceship accelerating with acceleration a < g (g is the acceleration due to gravity on Earth) in outer space, its submerged volume in water is f2V. Then:
A railway wagon (open at the top) of mass M1 is moving with speed v1 along a straight track. As a result of rain, after some time it gets partially filled with water so that the mass of the wagon becomes M2 and speed becomes v2. Taking the rain to be falling vertically and the water stationery inside the wagon, the relation between the two speeds v1 and v2 is :
Consider the following statements:
1. Distance between the longitudes becomes zero on North Pole and South Pole.
2. Distance between the longitudes is maximum on the Equator.
3. Number of longitudes is more than number of latitudes.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
One block of 2⋅0 kg mass is placed on top of another block of 3⋅0 kg mass. The coefficient of static friction between the two blocks is 0⋅2. The bottom block is pulled with a horizontal force F such that both the blocks move together without slipping. Taking acceleration due to gravity as 10 m/s2, the maximum value of the frictional force is :
