List - I List - II (a) Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra, Dehradun v. State of Uttar Pradesh (i) Grant of a lease of land or its renewal without the approval of the central government is void (b) Samatha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (ii) Balancing environmental and ecological integrity against industrial demands on forest resources. (c) K.V. Shanmugam vs. State of Tamil Nadu (iii) Renewal of lease on forest land is not a vested right (d) State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ganesh Wood Products (iv) Forest-based industries donot have an absolute or an unrestricted right to operate their units where forest resources are scarce.
Codes:
Environmental Law Case Matching
This section outlines the solution for matching key environmental law cases from List - I with their corresponding principles in List - II.
Correct Case-to-Principle Matches
The correct pairings are established as follows:
- (a) Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra, Dehradun v. State of Uttar Pradesh is matched with (ii) Balancing environmental and ecological integrity against industrial demands on forest resources.
- (b) Samatha v. State of Andhra Pradesh is matched with (iii) Renewal of lease on forest land is not a vested right.
- (c) K.V. Shanmugam vs. State of Tamil Nadu is matched with (i) Grant of a lease of land or its renewal without the approval of the central government is void.
- (d) State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ganesh Wood Products is matched with (iv) Forest-based industries donot have an absolute or an unrestricted right to operate their units where forest resources are scarce.
Case Analysis
Rural Litigation Kendra Case (a)-(ii)
This landmark case highlights the critical need to balance environmental preservation and ecological health with the needs of industrial activities, particularly concerning forest resources.
Samatha Case (b)-(iii)
The principle associated with this match states that renewing a lease on forest land is not an automatic entitlement or a vested right.
K.V. Shanmugam Case (c)-(i)
This case addresses the validity of land leases, establishing that any grant or renewal requires central government approval; otherwise, it is void.
Ganesh Wood Products Case (d)-(iv)
This ruling clarifies that forest-based industries do not possess an unlimited right to operate, especially in areas where forest resources are scarce.
Final Answer Selection
Based on the confirmed matches (a)-(ii), (b)-(iii), (c)-(i), (d)-(iv), the correct option is selected.
Important Questions from Environmental law
- Which of the following judicial principle has often been involved by Indian courts to uphold environmental clearance requirements under EIA?
- The Principle of Absolute Liability, evolved in Indian environmental jurisprudence, is primarily associated with which of the following landmark case?
- In which of the following case, the Supreme Court of India gave a split verdict on 23rd July, 2024 in a matter involving health, environment and intergenerational equity?
- Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I Judicial Decisions LIST-II Issue A. State of Gujarat v/s Reliance Industries Ltd & Ors. I. Management of sewage treatment plants B. Municipal Corporation Ghaziabad v/s Central Pollution Control Board II. Climate Change C. Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v/s U.O.I III. Environmental Clearance for large infrastructure project D. Riddhima Pandey v/s U.O.I IV. Green cess
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: - Seven Legislations are listed under Schedule I of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. Which of the following Act is not included under Schedule I?
