List - I
(Principle)List - II
(Associated Case)(a) Absolute Liability (i) Gloucester Grammar School (b) Damnum sine injuria (ii) Ashby Vs. White (c) Injuria sine damnum (iii) Stanely Vs. Powel (d) Inevitable accident (iv) Ryland Vs. Fletcher
Law Principles and Associated Cases Matching Solution
This solution details the correct matching of legal principles from List-I with their associated cases from List-II, based on the provided correct answer.
Principle-Case Associations
| List - I (Principle) | List - II (Associated Case) |
|---|---|
| (a) Absolute Liability | (ii) Ashby Vs. White |
| (b) Damnum sine injuria | (iii) Stanely Vs. Powel |
| (c) Injuria sine damnum | (iv) Ryland Vs. Fletcher |
| (d) Inevitable accident | (i) Gloucester Grammar School |
Principle-Case Breakdown
(a) Absolute Liability and (ii) Ashby Vs. White: According to the correct answer, Absolute Liability is associated with the case of Ashby Vs. White. This principle typically concerns liability without fault for inherently dangerous activities.
(b) Damnum sine injuria and (iii) Stanely Vs. Powel: The provided correct answer links Damnum sine injuria (harm without legal injury) to the case of Stanely Vs. Powel. This case involved an injury caused by an accidental discharge of a gun.
(c) Injuria sine damnum and (iv) Ryland Vs. Fletcher: As per the correct answer, Injuria sine damnum (violation of a legal right without actual harm) is matched with Ryland Vs. Fletcher. This landmark case is generally associated with strict liability.
(d) Inevitable accident and (i) Gloucester Grammar School: The correct answer associates Inevitable accident with the Gloucester Grammar School case. This case is traditionally cited for the principle of damnum sine injuria.
Important Questions from Tort
- Which of the following is not a general defence under Torts?
A. Mistake
B. Remoteness
C. Necessity
D. Consent
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: - Which of the following is not an absolute privilege under the law of torts?
- Which of the following case does not relate to the concept of absolute liability under law of India?
- "Just as the criminal law consists of a body of rules establishing specific offence, so the law of torts consists of a body of rules establishing specific injuries". Who stated this ?
- Consider the following elements :
(a) Infringement of a legal right
(b) Any damage
(c) Existence of a legal right
(d) Legal damages
Right to claim damages in tort would arise only if :
