'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is a decision based on:
Incomplete information may cause harm.
The saying 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is a common idiom that reflects on the potential pitfalls of having only a superficial understanding of a subject. It suggests that knowing just a little bit about something can lead to mistakes, overconfidence, or taking actions based on incomplete information, which can ultimately cause harm or undesirable consequences.
Let's examine the given options in the context of this idiom.
This idiom means that not knowing about something unpleasant is preferable to knowing about it. This is the opposite of 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing', which warns against having *some* knowledge, not *no* knowledge.
This option comments on the quality or effectiveness of informal learning methods. While informal learning might sometimes result in incomplete knowledge, the idiom's focus is on the *state* of having little knowledge, regardless of how it was acquired.
This option relates danger to the size of physical objects or issues. The idiom 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is about the *amount* or *depth* of understanding, not the physical size of things.
This option directly aligns with the meaning of 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing'. 'Little knowledge' is essentially 'incomplete information'. Acting or deciding based on incomplete information means you don't see the full picture, which can easily lead to errors, misjudgments, or unintended negative outcomes. Therefore, incomplete information can indeed cause harm, which is the core idea behind the idiom.
The decision basis for the saying 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is the understanding that acting upon incomplete information is inherently risky. When someone has only a little knowledge, they may:
All these factors can lead to mistakes that result in harm, loss, or other negative results. Thus, the danger comes not from knowing nothing, but from thinking you know enough when you only possess a small, potentially misleading, amount of information. This is why incomplete information may cause harm.
Based on the analysis, the most accurate decision basis for the idiom 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is that incomplete information may cause harm. The phrase serves as a warning against relying on superficial understanding when dealing with matters that require deeper knowledge.
| Idiom/Concept | Meaning | Relation to 'Little knowledge is dangerous' |
|---|---|---|
| Ignorance is bliss | Not knowing is better than knowing something unpleasant. | Opposite meaning; focuses on lack of knowledge being positive. |
| Informal learning is not satisfactory | Critique of a learning method's quality. | May lead to little knowledge, but isn't the basis of its danger. |
| Little things are dangerous | Danger based on size. | Unrelated to the amount or depth of knowledge. |
| Incomplete information may cause harm | Acting without full understanding can lead to negative outcomes. | Directly corresponds to 'little knowledge' causing danger. |
| Term | Definition/Explanation | Importance |
|---|---|---|
| Idiom | A phrase whose meaning cannot be deduced from the literal meanings of its words. | 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is an idiom. |
| Little Knowledge | Having only a small or superficial amount of understanding about a subject. | The subject of the idiom's warning. |
| Incomplete Information | Data or facts that do not cover all aspects needed for full understanding or a sound decision. | Synonymous with 'little knowledge' in this context. |
| Cause Harm | To lead to injury, damage, loss, or negative consequences. | The dangerous outcome associated with little knowledge. |
Understanding why incomplete information is dangerous has practical implications:
The warning in 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is essentially a call for intellectual humility and diligence in acquiring sufficient information before acting.
In this question, a passage is given followed by a statement. Read the passage carefully and judge the statement based on the given passage.
Over three lakh birds of different species have arrived in Kashmir valley, according to wildlife warden wetlands of Kashmir, Rouf Zargar. Usually every year, approximately 9 lakh birds migrate to the valley from different cold habitats of the world. Therefore, the valley witnesses new species of birds every year. Birds can go any place depending upon the leading flock. Kashmir is comparatively less cold than their own natural habitat which makes birds to start migrating to the valley in September every year.
The birds can help in increasing tourism in the valley. Shikara owner Bashir Ahmad said, "Since tourism in valley is not gaining its pace in valley after 2016 turmoil, these migratory birds can attract tourist from across the globe, if tourism department can project them in planned way, and advertise at big level, definitely it will help to boost tourism in valley"
Statement:
Birds migrate to Kashmir valley as it is colder compared to their natural habitat.
Choose the appropriate one from the following options
A -The statement is definitely true
B -The statement is probably true
C -The statement is cannot be determined
D -The statement is definitely false
Consider the given statement and decide which of the given assumptions is/are implicit in the statement.
Statement:
Indians go abroad to get better jobs.
Assumptions:
1. Indians can get better jobs abroad.
2. India lacks better job opportunities.
Human beings always have _______.