Let Xi be an absolutely continuous random variable having the probability density function \(f_i(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{cl} i e^{-i x}, & \text { if } x \geq 0 \\ 0, & \text { if } x<0 \end{array}, \right.\)i = 1, 2 . Consider a series system comprising of independent components having random lifetimes described by random variables X1 and X2. Let X denote the lifetime of the series system. Then which of the following statements are true?
The question describes a series system composed of two independent components, \(X_1\) and \(X_2\), with given probability density functions (PDFs). For a series system, the system fails if any one of its components fails. Therefore, the lifetime of the series system, denoted by \(X\), is the minimum of the lifetimes of the individual components.
The PDFs for \(X_1\) and \(X_2\) are given as:
For an exponential distribution with rate \(\lambda\), the probability \(P(X > x)\), also known as the survival function, is given by \(e^{-\lambda x}\) for \(x \geq 0\).
The lifetime of the series system is \(X = \min(X_1, X_2)\). Since \(X_1\) and \(X_2\) are independent, the survival function of \(X\) is:
\(P(X > x) = P(\min(X_1, X_2) > x)\)
This means both \(X_1\) and \(X_2\) must be greater than \(x\):
\(P(X > x) = P(X_1 > x \text{ and } X_2 > x)\)
Due to independence:
\(P(X > x) = P(X_1 > x) P(X_2 > x)\)
Substituting the survival functions of \(X_1\) and \(X_2\):
\(P(X > x) = e^{-x} \times e^{-2x} = e^{-(x+2x)} = e^{-3x}\), for \(x \geq 0\).
The survival function \(P(X > x) = e^{-3x}\) for \(x \geq 0\) corresponds to an exponential distribution with rate parameter \(\lambda = 3\). Thus, \(X \sim \text{Exponential}(3)\).
Now let's evaluate each given statement based on the fact that \(X\) follows an exponential distribution with rate 3.
Statement 1: \(P(X > 4) = P(X > 1) P(X > 2)\)
Using \(P(X > x) = e^{-3x}\):
The right side is \(P(X > 1) P(X > 2) = e^{-3} \times e^{-6} = e^{-3-6} = e^{-9}\).
Comparing both sides: \(e^{-12} \neq e^{-9}\). Therefore, Statement 1 is false.
Statement 2: \(P(X > 4| X > 2) = P(X > 2)\)
This statement involves conditional probability. We can use the property of exponential distributions that they are memoryless. The memoryless property states that for an exponentially distributed random variable \(X\), \(P(X > t+s | X > s) = P(X > t)\) for any \(t, s \geq 0\).
In this statement, we have \(s = 2\) and \(t = 4 - 2 = 2\). So the statement becomes \(P(X > 2+2 | X > 2) = P(X > 2)\), which is exactly the memoryless property \(P(X > t+s | X > s) = P(X > t)\) with \(t=2\).
Alternatively, using the conditional probability formula \(P(A|B) = P(A \cap B) / P(B)\):
\(P(X > 4| X > 2) = \frac{P(X > 4 \text{ and } X > 2)}{P(X > 2)}\)
Since \(X > 4\) implies \(X > 2\), the event \(X > 4 \text{ and } X > 2\) is simply \(X > 4\).
\(P(X > 4| X > 2) = \frac{P(X > 4)}{P(X > 2)}\)
Using \(P(X > x) = e^{-3x}\):
\(P(X > 4| X > 2) = \frac{e^{-3 \times 4}}{e^{-3 \times 2}} = \frac{e^{-12}}{e^{-6}} = e^{-12 - (-6)} = e^{-6}\).
Now, let's calculate \(P(X > 2)\):
\(P(X > 2) = e^{-3 \times 2} = e^{-6}\).
Comparing both sides: \(e^{-6} = e^{-6}\). Therefore, Statement 2 is true.
Statement 3: \(E(X)=\frac{1}{3}\)
For an exponentially distributed random variable with rate \(\lambda\), the expected value (mean) is given by \(E(X) = 1/\lambda\).
Since \(X \sim \text{Exponential}(3)\), the rate parameter is \(\lambda = 3\).
\(E(X) = \frac{1}{3}\).
Therefore, Statement 3 is true.
Statement 4: \(6 X \sim \chi_3^2\)
We know that if a random variable \(Y\) follows an exponential distribution with rate \(\lambda\), i.e., \(Y \sim \text{Exponential}(\lambda)\), then \(2\lambda Y\) follows a chi-squared distribution with 2 degrees of freedom, i.e., \(2\lambda Y \sim \chi^2(2)\).
In our case, \(X \sim \text{Exponential}(3)\). So, \(\lambda = 3\).
According to the property, \(2 \times 3 X = 6X\) follows a chi-squared distribution with 2 degrees of freedom, i.e., \(6X \sim \chi^2(2)\).
The statement claims that \(6X \sim \chi_3^2\), which is a chi-squared distribution with 3 degrees of freedom.
Since \(6X \sim \chi^2(2)\) and not \(\chi^2(3)\), Statement 4 is false.
Based on the analysis, Statement 2 and Statement 3 are true.
In a Latin square design, the degrees of freedom for the sum of squares due to error is 42. Then the degrees of freedom for the sum of squares due to treatments is
In any class of 50 students, which one of the following statements is necessarily true?
Suppose \(A=\left((a_{i j})\right) \sim W_3(5, \Sigma)\), where \(\Sigma=\left(\begin{array}{lll}2 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 2\end{array}\right)\). Then which of the following statements are true?
Suppose U ~ Uniform (0, 1), and X = \(\tan \left(\pi\left(U-\frac{1}{2}\right)\right)\). Then which of the following statements are true?