Deconstructing the Pet Culture Argument

The passage describes a shift in Indian pet culture where individuals view themselves as 'pet-parents' due to an emotional bond, moving away from a utilitarian 'pet-owner' perspective focused merely on providing food and shelter. This highlights a transition towards emotional transactions over utilitarian ones.

Identifying Statements That Weaken the Argument

To weaken the argument, we look for options that suggest utilitarian motives persist or contradict the notion of a purely emotional relationship with pets.

Analysis of Option A: Influencer Motives

The statement, "Some social media influencers are using their pets only for popularity," introduces a utilitarian motive (popularity) behind interacting with pets. If influencers, who often shape trends, prioritize popularity over an emotional bond, it challenges the claim that the shift is solely towards emotional transactions. This weakens the argument.

Analysis of Option C: Financial Considerations

The statement, "Pet owners are expecting some provision for tax rebate," points towards seeking financial benefits (like tax rebates) associated with pet ownership. This expectation of monetary advantage suggests a utilitarian aspect is still present, undermining the argument that the relationship is purely emotional and not utilitarian.

Evaluation of Other Options

Option B: Availability of Pet Supplies

The easy availability of pet supplies like food, medicines, and clothes supports the idea of responsible pet care, which aligns with the 'pet-parent' concept. This statement does not weaken the argument; it potentially reinforces it by showing increased commitment to pet well-being.

Option D: Emotional Support from Pets

Pets providing emotional support in stressful times directly supports the central theme of the passage – the importance of emotional connection. This statement strengthens, rather than weakens, the argument about the shift towards emotional transactions.

Based on this analysis, options A and C weaken the argument presented in the passage.