All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

In which year did the companies IBM and Coca Cola shut down their operations for not being able to comply with the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act that mandated foreign investors cannot own over 40% in Indian enterprises?

The correct answer is

1977

Understanding FERA and its Impact on Foreign Companies in India

The question asks about the specific year when major multinational corporations, IBM and Coca-Cola, decided to cease operations in India. This decision was a direct consequence of their inability or unwillingness to comply with a significant piece of Indian legislation related to foreign investment and exchange controls.

The legislation in question is the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), specifically the version enacted in 1973. FERA 1973 aimed to regulate certain payments, dealings in foreign exchange and gold, and imports and exports of currency and bullion. A key provision of this act was that foreign companies operating in India were required to dilute their foreign equity stake to a maximum of 40%.

Key Provisions of FERA 1973 Affecting Foreign Companies

  • Mandated that foreign companies operating in India must reduce their foreign equity shareholding to no more than 40%.
  • Required prior permission from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for various activities involving foreign exchange.
  • Aimed to conserve foreign exchange resources and regulate payments outside India.

Why IBM and Coca-Cola Exited India

IBM (International Business Machines) and Coca-Cola were prominent foreign companies operating in India when FERA 1973 was enacted. They were significantly impacted by the 40% foreign equity limit. Both companies were built on models that required a high level of control over their global operations and technology/formula. Diluting their ownership to 40% meant losing majority control, which they were unwilling to do. They preferred to exit the Indian market rather than comply with this specific regulation.

The Year of Exit

Following the implementation and enforcement of the FERA 1973 regulations, companies were given time to comply. However, by 1977, several foreign companies that could not or would not meet the 40% foreign equity requirement decided to shut down their operations in India. IBM and Coca-Cola were among the most notable foreign investors that chose to leave the country in that year.

Therefore, the year when IBM and Coca Cola shut down their operations for not being able to comply with the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act's mandate regarding foreign ownership was 1977.

Analysis of Options

Let's look at the given options in the context of FERA and the exit of these companies:

  • 1964: This year predates FERA 1973. While there were exchange controls, the specific 40% equity mandate that led to the exit of IBM and Coca-Cola was not in place.
  • 1981: By 1981, the exits related to the initial FERA 1973 implementation had already occurred.
  • 1956: This year is much earlier and is associated with the Companies Act of 1956, which dealt with company regulation but not the specific foreign exchange equity restrictions imposed by FERA 1973.
  • 1977: This is the year when the compliance deadline pressures led to the exit of several foreign companies, including IBM and Coca-Cola, due to the 40% foreign equity rule under FERA 1973.

Based on historical facts regarding the enforcement of FERA 1973 and the business decisions of IBM and Coca-Cola, the year they shut down their operations in India is 1977.

Year Relevance to FERA/Exits
1964 Before FERA 1973
1981 After major exits related to FERA 1973 occurred
1956 Associated with Companies Act, not FERA 1973 equity rule
1977 Year IBM and Coca-Cola exited India due to FERA 1973 compliance issues

Revision Table: Key FERA Concepts and IBM/Coca Cola Exit

Concept Description
FERA 1973 Foreign Exchange Regulation Act enacted in 1973 to regulate foreign exchange and investment.
40% Foreign Equity Rule A key mandate under FERA 1973 requiring foreign companies to dilute foreign ownership to a maximum of 40%.
IBM's Stance Unwilling to dilute majority ownership (requiring complex restructuring) and share technology; exited instead.
Coca-Cola's Stance Unwilling to reveal its secret formula to a potential Indian partner/entity or dilute ownership; exited instead.
Year of Exit 1977, when compliance with FERA 1973 became a critical factor for continued operation.

Additional Information on FERA and India's Economic Policy

FERA 1973 was a product of India's economic policy at the time, which was focused on self-reliance, import substitution, and tighter state control over the economy, including foreign investment. The high foreign equity limits were intended to give Indian partners greater control and promote local industry development. While it achieved some of these goals, it also led to the exit of companies like IBM and Coca-Cola, impacting access to certain technologies and global brands.

FERA was later replaced by the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) in 1999, which reflected a shift towards a more liberalized economic environment in India, reducing many restrictions on foreign exchange transactions and foreign investment. This change paved the way for many foreign companies, including IBM and Coca-Cola, to return to the Indian market in the 1990s.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Foreign exchange market

  1. Identify the drivers for increased Foreign Institutional Investment flows in Indian stock markets in recent times

    A. Covid-19 pandemic driven liquidity outflows from the western capital markets

    B. Geopolitical supply chain relocations

    C. Increased India weightage in MSCI Emerging Market Index

    D. Steep decline in interest rates in large market friendly economies

    E. Favourable risk-reward ratios in Indian stock markets

    Choose the correct  answer from the options given below:

  2. Which of the following constitutes Foreign Direct Investment?

  3. Arrange the following modes of entry in foreign markets starting with the mode of entry having least commitment, risk, control and profit potential:

    (A) Company hires a local manufacturer to produce the product.

    (B) Company starts exports working through domestic export agents and exports management companies.

    (C) Company joins hands with local investor and forms a company in which both share ownership and control.

    (D) Company starts export using domestic export department and overseas sales branch.

    (E) Company offers a complete brand concept and operating system to an investor in return of certain fee.

    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  4. Given below are two statements: One is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R.

    Assertion (A):  Sustained current account surplus encourages the government to liberalize imports and capital movements.

    Reasons (R):  The current account and balance of payments positions of a country can significantly influence its economic policies.

    In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  5. Which of the following are types of foreign exchange risks or exposures?

    A. Translation Exposure

    B. Transaction Exposure

    C. Social Exposure

    D. Economic Exposure

    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App