In which of the following educational policy/act of India, Indian sign language for teaching and monitoring is involved?
The question asks which educational policy or act in India specifically involves or promotes Indian Sign Language (ISL) for teaching and monitoring. Let's examine the options provided to understand their focus and how they address the needs of students who use sign language.
The National Policy on Education of 1986 was a significant policy aimed at restructuring the education system. It focused on various aspects like universalisation of elementary education, equity, and quality improvement. While it addressed the education of children with disabilities, it did not specifically focus on the use or standardization of Indian Sign Language for teaching or monitoring.
The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act of 1995 was enacted to provide for the education, employment, and other rights of persons with disabilities. This act mandated inclusive education and access to appropriate resources. However, similar to NPE-1986, it did not explicitly detail provisions for standardizing or mandating the use of Indian Sign Language specifically for teaching and monitoring within the educational framework.
The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, replaced the 1995 Act and expanded the list of recognized disabilities and the rights of persons with disabilities. It strengthened provisions for inclusive education and accessibility. While it emphasized accessible communication formats, it still did not lay out a detailed plan or mandate for the widespread use and standardization of Indian Sign Language for teaching across all levels of education in the explicit manner needed for teaching and monitoring.
The National Education Policy 2020 is a comprehensive framework aiming to transform the Indian education system. A key focus of NEP-2020 is inclusive and equitable education for all, including children with disabilities. The policy specifically recognizes the importance of Indian Sign Language. It proposes standardizing Indian Sign Language across the country and developing national and state curriculum materials using ISL. It talks about integrating ISL into the school curriculum as a language option where feasible and promoting its use for teaching and learning, especially for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. The policy's emphasis on making educational content accessible naturally includes providing materials and instruction in formats like ISL, thereby involving it in teaching and monitoring student progress.
NEP-2020 is the policy that most explicitly addresses the role of Indian Sign Language in education. It goes beyond general accessibility provisions found in previous acts by recommending concrete steps for the promotion and standardization of ISL. This makes it integral to the teaching and learning process for specific student groups. The policy envisions ISL becoming a part of the mainstream educational effort for inclusive classrooms.
Based on the analysis of the mentioned policies and acts, the National Education Policy 2020 (NEP-2020) is the one that specifically includes and promotes the involvement of Indian Sign Language for teaching and monitoring within the Indian educational system.
| Policy/Act | Year | Specific Mention of ISL for Teaching/Monitoring? | Key Focus Related to Disabilities in Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| NPE | 1986 | No specific mandate for ISL use in teaching/monitoring. | Integrated education for children with disabilities. |
| PwD Act | 1995 | No specific mandate for ISL use in teaching/monitoring. | Rights, access, and inclusive education for persons with disabilities. |
| RPwD Act | 2016 | Promotes accessible communication but no detailed plan for ISL in teaching/monitoring. | Expanded rights, inclusive education, accessibility for persons with disabilities. |
| NEP | 2020 | Yes, promotes standardization of ISL, curriculum development in ISL, and integration in teaching. | Inclusive and equitable education, accessibility, recognition and promotion of ISL. |
The inclusion of Indian Sign Language (ISL) in educational policy is crucial for ensuring that deaf and hard-of-hearing students have equal access to education. ISL is their natural language, and using it in teaching provides direct access to information and facilitates cognitive development and learning. Standardizing ISL and incorporating it into curriculum materials helps create truly inclusive learning environments where communication barriers are minimized. This focus in NEP-2020 marks a significant step towards linguistic and educational equity for the deaf community in India.
Arrange the following chronologically:
A. The National Commission on Teachers - I
B. NCFTE : Towards preparing the Professional and Humane Teacher
C. The NPE review committee
D. National Advisory Committee on Learning without Burden
E. The Curriculum framework for Quality Teacher Education
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Arrange the following in chronological order of their formation starting from the oldest to latest
A. Secondary Education Commission
B. Education Commission
C. National Knowledge Commission
D. University Education Commission
E. Justice Verma Commission
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Which of the following recommendations has implications for the content of pre-service and in-service teacher-education programs?
I. All teachers teaching must have basic proficiency in English
II. All teachers should have the skills to teach English appropriately according to their conditions and levels
Arrange the following in a chronological order of their formation from the earliest to the latest:
A. NAAC
B. NCTE
C. UGC
D. NCERT
E. NIEPA
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Match List I with List II
| List I | List II | ||
| A. | Justice Verma Commission | I. | Education for National development |
| B. | Mudaliar Commission | II. | Vision of teacher education in India: Quality and Regulatory perspective |
| C. | Yashpal Committee | III. | Secondary Education Commission |
| D. | Kothari Commission | IV. | Reviving higher education system |
| V. | Learning without burden |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: