In the Parliament of India, the purpose of an adjournment motion is:
to allow a discussion on a definite matter of urgent public importance
The question asks about the primary purpose of an adjournment motion in the Parliament of India. This is a specific parliamentary procedure used to interrupt the normal business of the House.
An adjournment motion is a proposal to adjourn the regular business of the House for discussing a definite matter of urgent public importance. It's considered an extraordinary device because it sets aside the normal schedule to address a specific issue. Both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha have provisions for adjournment motions, though in practice, it is more frequently used in the Lok Sabha.
The main objective of an adjournment motion is to draw the attention of the House to a recent matter of urgent public concern, which needs immediate discussion. It involves an element of censure against the government for its failure to act properly in a matter of urgent public importance. Consequently, it requires the support of a significant number of members (usually 50 members in Lok Sabha) to be admitted.
Let's examine each option provided to determine which accurately describes the purpose of an adjournment motion:
This option directly aligns with the core definition and purpose of an adjournment motion. It is specifically designed to enable the House to discuss a pressing issue that cannot wait for the regular legislative agenda.
While opposition members use various parliamentary tools to seek information (like questions during Question Hour, calling attention motions, etc.), the primary purpose of an adjournment motion is not merely to collect information. It's about discussing and potentially censuring the government on a specific urgent issue.
This describes the purpose of a cut motion, which is part of the process of discussing demands for grants during the budget session. There are different types of cut motions (token cut, economy cut, policy cut), but they are distinct from an adjournment motion.
While proceedings might be adjourned temporarily by the presiding officer due to disorderly conduct, this is a general power of the Speaker/Chairman to maintain order, not the specific purpose initiated by members through an adjournment motion. An adjournment motion is initiated by a member to discuss a matter, not to handle member behavior.
Based on the analysis of the options and the definition of an adjournment motion, it is clear that its main purpose is to allow the Parliament to set aside its normal business to urgently discuss a specific issue of significant public importance.
| Motion Type | Primary Purpose | Requires Censure Element |
|---|---|---|
| Adjournment Motion | Discuss definite matter of urgent public importance | Yes (Implied censure of government failure) |
| Calling Attention Motion | Draw attention to a matter of public importance and seek a statement from Minister | No |
| Cut Motion | Reduce amount of demand for grant during budget discussion | No |
Here's a quick summary of the key aspects of an adjournment motion:
Apart from the adjournment motion, the Indian Parliament uses several other tools to ensure accountability and discuss important issues:
Each parliamentary device, including the adjournment motion, serves a distinct purpose in the functioning of the legislature.
Who appoints the Chief Election Commissioner of India?
What is correct about the dismissal of Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha ?
i. He can be dismissed by no-confidence motion
ii. To introduce such resolution prior notice of 14 days is essential
iii. Such resolution should be passed by absolute majority
iv. Such resolution should be passed by a majority of the ten members of the house
What is correct ?
i. Finance Bill can be introduced in Lok Sabha only
ii. Rajya Sabha can detain the Finance Bill
If the Vice President removed from his office, what shall happened?
Consider the following statements :
1. In India, there is no law restricting the candidates from contesting in one Lok Sabha election from three constituencies.
2. In 1991 Lok Sabha Election, Shri Devi Lal contested from three Lok Sabha constituencies.
3. As per the- existing rules, if a candidate contests in one Lok Sabha election from many constituencies, his/her party should bear the cost of bye elections to the constituencies vacated by him/her in the event of him/her winning in all the constituencies.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?