In the following question out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the bracketed part of the sentence. In case no improvement in needed , select “no improvement”. If all of us (had been) philosophical thinkers, we would not have been deceived by scheming politicians all these years.
no improvement
The question asks us to evaluate the bracketed part "(had been)" in the sentence: "If all of us (had been) philosophical thinkers, we would not have been deceived by scheming politicians all these years." We need to determine if this part needs improvement or if it is already correct.
Let's analyze the structure of the given sentence. It is a conditional sentence describing a hypothetical situation in the past and its hypothetical outcome in the past. This type of sentence is known as the third conditional.
The structure of the third conditional is typically:
\(\text{If} + \text{subject} + \text{had} + \text{past participle (or had been + noun/adjective)}, \text{subject} + \text{would have} + \text{past participle}\)
In the given sentence:
Let's examine the bracketed part "(had been)". The verb 'to be' in the past perfect tense is 'had been'. In the 'if' clause, "had been" is used correctly with the subject "all of us" to form the past perfect tense. "Philosophical thinkers" acts as a complement following "had been".
The main clause "we would not have been deceived..." uses "would have" followed by the past participle of the verb "deceive" ("been deceived" in the passive voice), which correctly follows the third conditional structure.
Since the sentence follows the correct structure of the third conditional, the use of "had been" in the 'if' clause is grammatically correct to express a past hypothetical state (being philosophical thinkers).
Let's consider the given options:
Based on the analysis of the third conditional structure and the incorrectness of the other options, the original sentence using "(had been)" is correct.
The sentence "If all of us had been philosophical thinkers, we would not have been deceived by scheming politicians all these years" is a grammatically correct third conditional sentence. The use of "had been" in the 'if' clause is appropriate for this structure.
| Type | Usage | If Clause (Condition) | Main Clause (Result) | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zero Conditional | Facts, general truths | If + present simple | present simple | If you heat ice, it melts. |
| First Conditional | Real possibility in the future | If + present simple | will + base verb | If it rains, I will stay home. |
| Second Conditional | Unreal/Hypothetical situation in the present/future | If + past simple (or were) | would + base verb | If I won the lottery, I would buy a house. |
| Third Conditional | Unreal/Hypothetical situation in the past | If + past perfect | would have + past participle | If I had studied harder, I would have passed the exam. |
The past perfect tense is formed with "had" + the past participle of the main verb. It is used to talk about an action that was completed before another action or point in the past. When the verb is 'to be', the past perfect form is "had been".
In the third conditional, the past perfect in the 'if' clause refers to a condition that did not happen in the past. "If all of us had been philosophical thinkers" means that, in reality, all of us were *not* philosophical thinkers.
The main clause, using "would have" + past participle, describes the result that did not happen because the condition in the 'if' clause did not happen. "We would not have been deceived" means that, in reality, we *were* deceived.
Understanding the different types of conditional sentences and their correct tense usage is crucial for sentence improvement questions in English grammar.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”
My old teacher gave many poor students money in spite of he was poor.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
You should to read the newspaper regularly if you want to be well-informed.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
If he had listening to me he would not have got lost.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”
He asked for a bank loan also he didn't have sufficient resources.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
I went to the shop to buy some stationeries .