In the following electron transfer reactions, the one in which the bridging ligand comes from the reductant is
Electron transfer reactions are fundamental processes in chemistry where one species loses electrons (is oxidized, acting as the reductant) and another species gains electrons (is reduced, acting as the oxidant). These reactions can occur via two main mechanisms: outer-sphere and inner-sphere electron transfer.
In the inner-sphere mechanism, the two reacting metal complexes become directly linked by a common ligand, called a bridging ligand. This bridge facilitates the transfer of an electron from the reductant to the oxidant. The bridging ligand must be able to coordinate simultaneously to both metal centers.
A key aspect of the inner-sphere mechanism is the formation of a precursor complex where the two reactants are connected by the bridging ligand. After electron transfer occurs through the bridge, this complex breaks apart, forming the products.
The bridging ligand can originate from either the oxidant complex or the reductant complex. The question asks to identify the reaction where the bridging ligand comes from the reductant.
Let's examine each given electron transfer reaction to determine the roles of the reactants and the potential origin of a bridging ligand in an inner-sphere mechanism.
[IrCl6]2- + [Cr(OH2)6]2+ → products
[Cr(OH2)6]2+ (Cr is in +2 oxidation state, can be oxidized to +3).[IrCl6]2- (Ir is in +4 oxidation state, can be reduced to +3 or +2).[IrCl6]2- would likely bridge to Cr²⁺. The bridging ligand would come from the oxidant.[Co(NH3)5Cl]2+ + [Cr(OH2)6]2+ → products
[Cr(OH2)6]2+ (Cr²⁺ → Cr³⁺).[Co(NH3)5Cl]2+ (Co³⁺ → Co²⁺).[Fe(CN)6]4- + [IrCl6]2- → products
[Fe(CN)6]4- (Fe²⁺ → Fe³⁺).[IrCl6]2- (Ir⁴⁺ → Ir³⁺).[CrO4]2- + [Fe(CN)6]4- → products
[Fe(CN)6]4- (Fe²⁺ → Fe³⁺).[CrO4]2- (Cr⁶⁺ → lower oxidation states, e.g., Cr³⁺).[Fe(CN)6]4- complex can attack a chromium center in [CrO4]2-, forming a bridged intermediate like [(NC)5Fe^{III}-CN-Cr^{VI}O3]5-. Electron transfer then occurs across the cyanide bridge. In this specific pathway, the bridging ligand (CN⁻) comes from the reductant ([Fe(CN)6]4-).Comparing the options, options 1 and 2 typically involve bridging ligands from the oxidant. Option 3 can be outer-sphere, or inner-sphere potentially from either reactant's ligands. Option 4, the reaction between chromate and hexacyanoferrate(II), is known to proceed, at least partially, via an inner-sphere mechanism where a cyanide ligand from the hexacyanoferrate(II) (the reductant) bridges to the chromate (the oxidant).
Therefore, the electron transfer reaction in which the bridging ligand comes from the reductant is [CrO4]2- + [Fe(CN)6]4- → products.
Consider the following statements for the self‐exchange electron transfer reaction in [Cr(H2O)6]2+/3+
a. σ* orbitals are only involved in electron transfer
b. It involves large inner‐sphere reorganization energy
c. It involves no change in M–L bond lengths
d. Rate of self‐exchange electron transfer is fast
The correct statements are
In 3‐iron ferredoxins, the number of sulfide bridges and cysteinyl ligands, respectively, are:
The second order rate constants for the outer sphere self- exchange electron transfer reactions for [Ru(NH3)6]2+/[Ru(NH3)6]3+ and [Co(NH3)6]2+/[Co(NH3)6]3+ are 9.2 × 102 M-1 sec-1 and ≤ 10-9 M-1 sec-1, respectively.
The correct rationale for the above data is
Of the following assertions regarding the mechanism of electron transfer,
A. An outer-sphere mechanism involves electron transfer from the reductant to the oxidant, with the coordination shells or spheres of each staying intact.
B. In the inner-sphere mechanism, the reductant and oxidant share a ligand in their inner or primary coordination sphere which assists in electrons being transferred.
C. In the inner-sphere mechanism, an oxidant possesses at least one ligand capable of binding simultaneously to two metal ions.
D. In the inner-sphere mechanism, ligands of reductant are substitutionally inert.
The correct statements are