Question
In the absence of any cogent definition of unsoundness of mind, the world wide acceptance of its equivalent to insanity was propounded by
The correct answer is
Kenny
Unsoundness of Mind Equivalence
The question asks about the individual who proposed that "unsoundness of mind" is equivalent to "insanity", especially when a precise definition is lacking.
Attribution to Kenny
- The concept equating "unsoundness of mind" with "insanity" in the absence of a clear, universally accepted definition is often attributed to Kenny.
- This viewpoint was significant in legal and psychological discussions where distinguishing between degrees of mental impairment was crucial.
Therefore, Kenny is recognized for propounding this equivalence.
Was this answer helpful?
Important Questions from Law of Crimes
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I LIST-II A. Deterrent Theory of Punishment I. To maintain social order and ensure absence of crime in the society B. Retributive Theory of Punishment II. To stop others from committing similar crimes C. Reformative Theory of Punishment III. To return the same quantum of harm inflicted by the convict D. Preventive Theory of Punishment IV. To improve the mindset of the convict and ensure rightful thinking
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:- Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and with the help of codes given below find the correct explanation :
Assertion (A) : Nullum Crimen is an injunction to the legislature not to implicate all the suspected persons to be prosecuted.
Reason (R) : To avoid impossibility and to settle the question, the legislature must have to use administrative ruling.
Codes : - Read Assertion (A) and Reason(R) and with the help of codes given below find the correct explanation :
Assertion (A) : Participation in some manner in the act constituting the offence of common intention by all the persons to be prosecuted is necessary.
Reason (R) : Physical presence at the time of commission of crimes is not mandatory in all cases.
Codes : - Which of the mitigating factors do not justify the award of death penalty ?
- Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and with the help of codes given below find the correct explanation :
Assertion (A) : The gist of conspiracy lies in forming the scheme between two or more persons to perform the overt act.
Reason (R) : The alleged agreement must provide circumstantial evidence about the participation by all to establish conspiracy.
Codes :
Need Expert Advice?
