In a press meet on the recent scam, the minister said, "The buck stops here". What did the minister convey by the statement?
He will assume final responsibility
Minister's Statement: Understanding 'The Buck Stops Here' Idiom
The question asks about the meaning conveyed by a minister using the phrase "The buck stops here" during a press meet concerning a recent scam.
Understanding the Idiom: 'The Buck Stops Here'
The phrase "The buck stops here" is a well-known idiom in English. It signifies that the person saying it accepts ultimate responsibility for something and will not pass blame or responsibility onto others. It essentially means the final decision or accountability rests with that individual.
Analyzing the Minister's Statement
Let's analyze how this idiom applies to the options provided:
- Option 1: He wants all the money - This interpretation is incorrect. The idiom is about responsibility, not about desiring financial gain.
- Option 2: He will return the money - While taking responsibility might eventually lead to actions like returning money, the phrase itself doesn't directly state this intention. It's about accepting accountability, not a specific monetary action.
- Option 3: He will assume final responsibility - This option directly matches the meaning of "The buck stops here". By saying this, the minister is indicating that he accepts the ultimate accountability for the scam, regardless of who else might be involved or blamed.
- Option 4: He will resist all enquiries - This is the opposite of the idiom's meaning. Resisting enquiries suggests evasion of responsibility, whereas "The buck stops here" implies facing it directly.
Conclusion on the Minister's Conveyance
In the context of a scam and a press meet, when the minister stated, "The buck stops here," he was communicating that he takes the final responsibility for the situation. He is accepting accountability and implying that the blame or decision-making process will not be pushed further down the chain of command or to subordinates.
Important Questions from Critical Reasoning
As a responsible person, which of the following is not advisable?
- A, B, and C have a few chocolates among themselves. A gives to each of the other two half the number of chocolates they already have. Similarly B and C (in that order) give each of the other two half the number of chocolates each of them already has. Now, if each of them has the same number of chocolates, what could be the minimum number of chocolates they have among themselves?
Given question has main statement followed by four statements. Choose the ordered pair of statements, where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
When she takes an examination, she clears it.
A. she took an examination
B. she did not take an examination
C. she cleared it.
D. she did not clear it.
You are alone in your house and there is a danger of thieves around. You hear a knock on the door. What should be your most logical action?
While traveling in a train, you notice that a lady from the coach behind you falls from the stairs of the train. What should be your best rational course of action?
