In a photoelectric experiment, both sodium (work function = 2.3 eV) and tungsten (work function = 4.5 eV) metals are illuminated by an ultraviolet light of same wavelength. If the stopping potential for tungsten is measured to be 1.8 V, then the value of the stopping potential for sodium will be
4 V
The photoelectric effect describes the emission of electrons when light shines on a metal surface. The energy of the incident photon is used to overcome the work function of the metal (minimum energy required to eject an electron) and the remaining energy is given to the emitted electron as kinetic energy.
Einstein's photoelectric equation relates these quantities:
\begin{equation*} E = \phi + K_{max} \end{equation*}
where:
The maximum kinetic energy ($K_{max}$) is related to the stopping potential ($V_s$), which is the minimum negative potential applied to the collector plate to stop the most energetic electrons. This relationship is:
\begin{equation*} K_{max} = eV_s \end{equation*}
where $e$ is the elementary charge. Substituting this into the photoelectric equation, we get:
\begin{equation*} E = \phi + eV_s \end{equation*}
In this problem, both sodium and tungsten metals are illuminated by ultraviolet light of the same wavelength, meaning the energy of the incident photons ($E$) is the same for both metals.
For tungsten, we are given:
Using the equation $E = \phi + eV_s$, and noting that $eV_s$ has energy in Joules, while $V_s$ in Volts corresponds to energy $V_s$ in eV when multiplied by $e$, we can write the equation conveniently in terms of eV:
\begin{equation*} E = \phi_W + V_{sW} \quad (\text{when using } \phi \text{ in eV and } V_s \text{ in Volts/eV}) \end{equation*}
Plugging in the values for tungsten:
\begin{equation*} E = 4.5 \text{ eV} + 1.8 \text{ eV} \end{equation*}
\begin{equation*} E = 6.3 \text{ eV} \end{equation*}
So, the energy of the incident ultraviolet light photons is 6.3 eV.
Now, we use the same photon energy ($E = 6.3$ eV) for sodium. For sodium, we are given:
Using the photoelectric equation for sodium:
\begin{equation*} E = \phi_{Na} + eV_{sNa} \end{equation*}
Again, working in eV:
\begin{equation*} 6.3 \text{ eV} = 2.3 \text{ eV} + V_{sNa} \text{ eV} \end{equation*}
Rearranging the equation to solve for $V_{sNa}$:
\begin{equation*} V_{sNa} \text{ eV} = 6.3 \text{ eV} - 2.3 \text{ eV} \end{equation*}
\begin{equation*} V_{sNa} \text{ eV} = 4.0 \text{ eV} \end{equation*}
Thus, the stopping potential for sodium is 4.0 V.
| Metal | Work Function ($\phi$) | Stopping Potential ($V_s$) | Photon Energy ($E = \phi + V_s$) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tungsten | 4.5 eV | 1.8 V | 4.5 + 1.8 = 6.3 eV |
| Sodium | 2.3 eV | ? | Same as Tungsten = 6.3 eV |
Using $E = \phi_{Na} + V_{sNa}$: $6.3 = 2.3 + V_{sNa}$, which gives $V_{sNa} = 6.3 - 2.3 = 4.0$ V.
The value of the stopping potential for sodium is 4.0 V.
The wavelength of the matter waves associated with a fast moving sub-atomic particle depends upon
(i) charge
(ii) mass
(iii) velocity
(iv) spin state and
(v) momentum
The correct factors are
Schrodinger wave equation can be written as:
Energy of a photon of wavelength 5890A° emitted by sodium vapour lamp is
The experimental evidence that the electron exhibits wave-like characteristics was first provided by:
Which of the following equation correctly represents the momentum p of a photon of Energy E?