In a contract of sale, there is no implied condition as to quality or fitness for any particular purpose of goods supplied. According to which rule, it is the duty of buyer to see and satisfy whether the goods purchased will be suitable for his purpose or not?
In a contract for the sale of goods, a fundamental principle often applies regarding the quality and fitness of the items being purchased. The question highlights that there is generally no implied condition from the seller guaranteeing the quality or suitability of the goods for a specific purpose.
This situation directly relates to the legal doctrine of 'Caveat Emptor'. This Latin phrase translates to 'Let the buyer beware'.
According to the principle of Caveat Emptor:
The question states that there's no implied condition about quality or fitness. It asks about the rule where the duty of the buyer is to check if the goods are suitable. This perfectly describes the essence of Caveat Emptor.
Therefore, the rule where it is the duty of the buyer to ensure the goods purchased will be suitable for their purpose, given the absence of implied conditions, is Caveat Emptor.
Quality or fitness of goods for any particular purpose has no ............ .
When transfer of property in goods is to take place at future time or subject to some conditions thereafter to be fulfilled, the contract is called:
The ‘Part delivery’ under section 34 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 to be the ‘whole delivery’.
A sale in market overt is an exception of :