This problem asks us to determine which statement regarding operations between two matrices, A and B, is incorrect. Let's first identify the dimensions of the given matrices.
Matrix A is given as:
$ A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & -1 \\ 3 & 4 & 2 \\ 2 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} $Matrix A has 3 rows and 3 columns, so its dimensions are $3 \times 3$.
Matrix B is given as:
$ B = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3 \\ -4 & 0 \\ 2 & 5 \end{bmatrix} $Matrix B has 3 rows and 2 columns, so its dimensions are $3 \times 2$.
To determine if matrix operations are defined, we need to check the compatibility rules based on their dimensions.
Now, let's apply these rules to the matrices A ($3 \times 3$) and B ($3 \times 2$).
Check compatibility for AB:
Since the number of columns in A (3) is equal to the number of rows in B (3), the matrix multiplication AB is defined. This statement is correct.
Check compatibility for BA:
Since the number of columns in B (2) is not equal to the number of rows in A (3), the matrix multiplication BA is not defined. This statement is correct.
Check compatibility for A + B:
The dimensions of A and B are different. Therefore, the matrix addition A + B is not defined. This statement is correct.
Check compatibility for A - B:
The dimensions of A and B are different. Therefore, the matrix subtraction A - B is not defined. The statement claims that 'A - B is defined', which contradicts the rules of matrix operations. This statement is incorrect.
Based on the analysis, the statement "A - B is defined" is the one that is incorrect because matrices A and B do not have the same dimensions required for subtraction.