Assertion (A) Analysis: Realism and Pessimism Symbiosis

The assertion states that Realism and Pessimism have a symbiotic relationship. In international relations theory, Realism posits that states are primarily driven by self-interest and the pursuit of power in an anarchic international system. This perspective often leads to a pessimistic outlook regarding the possibilities for lasting peace and cooperation, as conflict is seen as inherent. Therefore, Realism and Pessimism are closely linked, often feeding into each other.

Conclusion: Assertion (A) is correct.

Reason (R) Analysis: Realism as a Complement to Pessimism

The reason suggests that Realism complements pessimism as a way of saving any confusion in international politics. While Realism provides a framework that often results in a pessimistic view, its primary function is to explain state behavior based on power dynamics and national interest, not necessarily to 'complement' pessimism to avoid confusion. Pessimism is more of a potential outcome or interpretation derived from a realist worldview. Realism explains the world as it is perceived, and this perception might be pessimistic, but the direct function isn't to 'complement pessimism' to 'save confusion'. The confusion in international politics stems from the nature of anarchy and power struggles that Realism describes, not something Realism actively complements pessimism to resolve.

Conclusion: Reason (R) is not completely correct. While Realism can lead to a pessimistic outlook, its role isn't accurately described as complementing pessimism to save confusion.

Final Conclusion

Based on the analysis, Assertion (A) is correct, but Reason (R) is not entirely accurate in its description of the relationship.

Therefore, the correct option is that (A) is correct, but (R) is not completely correct.