All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Identify the article of Indian Constitution that gave the Centre the powers to take over a state administration on the recommendation of the Governor?

The correct answer is

Article 356

Understanding President's Rule under the Indian Constitution

The question asks about the specific article in the Indian Constitution that grants the central government the authority to take over the administration of a state. This significant power, often referred to as President's Rule or State Emergency, is typically invoked when the constitutional machinery in a state breaks down. The recommendation of the state Governor plays a crucial role in this process.

Identifying the Article for State Administration Takeover

The power for the Centre to assume control over a state administration is enshrined in Part XVIII of the Indian Constitution, which deals with Emergency Provisions. Specifically, the article that addresses the failure of constitutional machinery in states is the key here.

  • Article 356: This article deals with the Provisions in case of failure of constitutional machinery in a State. It empowers the President of India to impose President's Rule in a state if the President is satisfied that the government of the state cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution. This satisfaction can be based on a report from the Governor of the state or even otherwise.

When President's Rule is imposed under Article 356, the President assumes to himself all or any of the functions of the Government of the State, or powers vested in or exercisable by the Governor, or powers vested in any body or authority in the State other than the Legislature of the State. The powers of the State Legislature are exercised by or under the authority of Parliament.

Examining Other Constitutional Articles

Let's look at the other options provided to understand why they are not the correct answer:

  • Article 365: This article is titled 'Effect of failure to comply with, or to give effect to, directions given by the Union'. It states that where any State has failed to comply with, or to give effect to, any directions given in the exercise of the executive power of the Union under any of the provisions of this Constitution, it shall be lawful for the President to hold that a situation has arisen in which the Government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution. While related to failure of a state government, it is about non-compliance with Union directions, not the primary article enabling take over based on Governor's report regarding constitutional machinery failure.
  • Article 386: This article was part of the original Constitution but was later repealed. It contained temporary provisions regarding the Legislative Assemblies of states specified in Part B of the First Schedule. It is not related to the Centre taking over state administration.
  • Article 368: This important article is located in Part XX of the Constitution and deals with the 'Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and Procedure therefor'. It outlines the process by which the Constitution can be amended. It has no relation to the imposition of central rule in a state due to the failure of constitutional machinery.

Based on the analysis, Article 356 is the article that specifically provides the Centre with the power to take over a state administration upon the failure of constitutional machinery, which can be reported by the Governor.

Revision Table: Key Articles of Indian Constitution

Article Number Subject Matter Relevance to Question
Article 356 Provisions in case of failure of constitutional machinery in a State (President's Rule) Directly grants power to Centre to take over state admin, often based on Governor's report.
Article 365 Effect of failure to comply with Union directions Related to failure of state government, but specific to non-compliance with Union directions.
Article 386 Repealed (Original temporary provisions for Part B States) Not in force; irrelevant to state administration takeover powers today.
Article 368 Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution Deals with Constitutional amendments, not state administration takeover.

Additional Information: President's Rule under Article 356

President's Rule is a critical emergency provision in the Indian Constitution, intended as a measure to preserve the democratic and constitutional framework of a state when its government cannot function according to the Constitution's principles. Here are some key points about Article 356:

  • Grounds for Imposition: President's Rule can be imposed if the President is satisfied that a situation has arisen where the state government cannot be carried on according to the Constitution. This could be due to political instability, breakdown of law and order, or non-compliance with Union directions (as covered under Article 365). The Governor's report is a significant, though not the only, basis for the President's satisfaction.
  • Procedure: A Proclamation under Article 356 must be approved by both Houses of Parliament. Initially, it remains in force for two months, and if approved by Parliament, it can continue for six months.
  • Duration: President's Rule can be extended for a maximum period of three years with parliamentary approval every six months. However, extensions beyond one year require special conditions related to a national emergency or an Election Commission certification.
  • Consequences: During President's Rule, the President can take over the executive functions of the state government, dissolve or suspend the state legislative assembly, and authorize Parliament to exercise the powers of the state legislature.
  • Judicial Review: The Supreme Court, in cases like S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), has held that the President's power under Article 356 is not absolute and is subject to judicial review. The Court can examine the grounds for imposing President's Rule.

Article 356 is a powerful tool but has also been a subject of controversy and debate regarding its potential for misuse for political purposes.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Framing the Constitution

  1. Who among the following while welcoming the Objectives Resolutions, said: “The real minorities are the masses of this country.”

  2. Choose the incorrect statement regarding ‘Objectives Resolutions’?

  3. Mahatma Gandhi was against separate electorates for the Depressed Classes because:

  4. Match List I with List II: 

    List - IList - II
    A. Dakshayani VelayudhanII. Removal of social disabilities
    B. Hansa MehtaIII. Justice for women
    C. R. V. DulekarIV. Hindi as national language 
    D. Shankarrao DeoI. Hindustani as language of nation

    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  5. The 'Constituent Assembly' was composed of how many members?

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App