(i) The Mangulam inscription mentions the king Nedunchezhiya Pandian. (ii) The Mangulam inscriptions were depicted in Tamil-Brahmi letters.
The question focuses on two key aspects of the Mangulam inscription, a significant historical artifact from ancient Tamil Nadu. We will examine each statement to determine its historical accuracy.
The first statement claims that the Mangulam inscription mentions the king Nedunchezhiya Pandian. Historical and archaeological evidence strongly supports this claim.
The second statement asserts that the Mangulam inscriptions were depicted in Tamil-Brahmi letters. This statement is also historically correct.
Based on the analysis of historical and epigraphic evidence, both statements regarding the Mangulam inscription are accurate. The inscription is a valuable primary source for studying the history of the Pandyan kingdom, the spread of Jainism, and the development of the Tamil-Brahmi script during the Sangam period.
Therefore, both (i) The Mangulam inscription mentions the king Nedunchezhiya Pandian and (ii) The Mangulam inscriptions were depicted in Tamil-Brahmi letters are correct statements.
The Hindu Kingdom in Sumatra Island was
Consider the following statement, and choose the correct answer from the codes given below :
Assertion (A): The Romans had trade contact with Tamil country and nearly 6 lakhs gold coins were transacted which led to the economic drain of the country.
Reason (R): Roman Trade declined after the death of Nero in 68 B.C.
Which of the following statement is true?
(i) In Sangam Age the Kingship was hereditary.
(ii) The King was called "Kon".
| List - I (Work) | List - II (Author) |
|---|---|
| (A) Kural | (I) Ilangoadigal |
| (B) Shilappadikaram | (II) Sattanar |
| (C) Manimekhalle | (III) Tolkappiyar |
| (D) Tolkappiyam | (IV) Tiruvalluvar |