Human beings are one among many creatures that inhabit an imagined world. In this imagined world, some creatures are cruel. If in this imagined world, it is given that the statement “Some human beings are not cruel creatures” is FALSE, then which of the following set of statement(s) can be logically inferred with certainty?
(i) All human beings are cruel creatures.
(ii) Some human beings are cruel creatures.
(iii) Some creatures that are cruel are human beings.
(iv) No human beings are cruel creatures.
Analyze the Given Premise
The core information provided is that the statement “Some human beings are not cruel creatures” is FALSE.
Derive the Certain Truth
In formal logic, when a statement of the form "Some A are not B" is determined to be false, its negation must be true. The logical negation of "Some A are not B" is "All A are B".
- Let 'A' represent the category 'human beings'.
- Let 'B' represent the category 'cruel creatures'.
Given that "Some human beings are not cruel creatures" (Some A are not B) is FALSE, we can logically conclude with certainty that "All human beings are cruel creatures" (All A are B) is TRUE. This forms our primary inference.
Evaluate Each Statement for Certainty
Statement (i): All human beings are cruel creatures.
This statement is the direct logical consequence derived from the given premise. Therefore, statement (i) is TRUE and can be inferred with certainty.
Statement (ii): Some human beings are cruel creatures.
If the statement "All human beings are cruel creatures" is TRUE, it logically follows that "Some human beings are cruel creatures" must also be TRUE. This inference assumes the existence of at least one human being, which is standard in such logic problems.
Therefore, statement (ii) is TRUE and can be inferred with certainty.
Statement (iii): Some creatures that are cruel are human beings.
This statement asserts that the intersection between the set of 'cruel creatures' and the set of 'human beings' is non-empty. This is logically equivalent to statement (ii). If "Some human beings are cruel creatures" is true, then "Some creatures that are cruel are human beings" must also be true.
Therefore, statement (iii) is TRUE and can be inferred with certainty.
Statement (iv): No human beings are cruel creatures.
This statement directly contradicts statement (i) ("All human beings are cruel creatures"), which we have already established as TRUE. A statement and its contradiction cannot both be true.
Therefore, statement (iv) is FALSE and cannot be inferred with certainty.
Final Conclusion
Based on the logical analysis, the statements that can be inferred with certainty are (i), (ii), and (iii).
Important Questions from Syllogism
Statements:
1. All heroes are winners.
2. All winners are lucky people.
Inferences:
I. All lucky people are heroes.
II. Some lucky people are heroes.
III. Some winners are heroes.
Which of the above inferences can be logically deduced from statements 1 and 2?- Given below are four statements.
Statement 1: All students are inquisitive.
Statement 2: Some students are inquisitive.
Statement 3: No student is inquisitive.
Statement 4: Some students are not inquisitive.
From the given four statements, find the two statements that CANNOT BE TRUE simultaneously, assuming that there is at least one student in the class. - Based only on the truth of the statement ‘Some humans are intelligent', which one of the following options can be logically inferred with certainty?
Given below are two statements and four conclusions drawn based on the statements.
Statement 1: Some bottles are cups.
Statement 2: All cups are knives.
Conclusion I: Some bottles are knives.
Conclusion II: Some knives are cups.
Conclusion III: All cups are bottles.
Conclusion IV: All knives are cups.
Which one of the following options can be logically inferred?Given below are three statements and four conclusions drawn based on the statements.
Statement 1: Some engineers are writers.
Statement 2: No writer is an actor.
Statement 3: All actors are engineers.Conclusion I: Some writers are engineers.
Conclusion II: All engineers are actors.
Conclusion III: No actor is a writer.
Conclusion IV: Some actors are writers.
Which one of the following options can be logically inferred?
