In India, foreigners can acquire citizenship through several means as outlined in the Citizenship Act, 1955. The question asks how a foreigner who has resided in India for 12 years can become an Indian citizen. This specific scenario points towards a particular method of acquisition.
Naturalisation is the process by which a foreigner voluntarily becomes a citizen of India. The key requirements for naturalisation, according to the Citizenship Act, 1955, are:
Specifically, regarding the residency requirement for naturalisation, the law typically requires the applicant to have resided in India for a total of 12 years and 7 months, including the 12 months immediately preceding the date of application. Therefore, a foreigner who has lived in India for 12 years would generally meet the primary residency condition for seeking citizenship through naturalisation.
Let's look at why the other options are less applicable in this context:
Given that the foreigner has lived in India for 12 years, the most fitting method for acquiring Indian citizenship among the choices provided is naturalisation, as it directly addresses long-term residency by a foreigner.
Which of the following is a feature of Directive Principles of State Policy, and also distinguishes it from Fundamental Rights?