Statement : Cyber crimes are increasing now-a-days.
Course of Action I : Regular updation of technical knowledge and equipments of police can reduce cyber crimes.
Course of Action II : Cyber crimes can be reduced by conducting awareness programmes among public regularly.
Cyber Crimes Analysis
The statement highlights a growing problem: the increase in cybercrimes.
Assessing Course of Action I
Course of Action I suggests improving the police force's capabilities by updating their technical knowledge and equipment.
- Reasoning: Enhanced technical skills and modern equipment enable law enforcement to better detect, investigate, and prevent cybercrimes.
- Conclusion: This action directly addresses the challenge posed by sophisticated cybercrimes and is a logical step to combat their rise.
Assessing Course of Action II
Course of Action II proposes educating the public through regular awareness programs.
- Reasoning: Many cybercrimes rely on public ignorance or susceptibility to scams. Awareness programs can empower individuals to recognize threats (like phishing or malware) and protect themselves.
- Conclusion: Educating the public is a proactive measure that logically contributes to reducing the overall incidence of cybercrimes.
Overall Evaluation
Both proposed courses of action are practical and relevant responses to the increasing trend of cybercrimes mentioned in the statement. They represent complementary strategies involving both law enforcement enhancement and public education.
Therefore, both Course of Action I and Course of Action II follow logically.
Important Questions from Course of Action (Notes)
- Identify the part containing a grammatical or structural error:
The jury was divided in their opinions. - Statement: There is a shortage of power in India
Courses of Action :
I. There should be more power projects initiated by the government
II. The government should encourage private investment in power projects
Which is the correct option ?
