He did not manage to fix the car himself, so he _______ in the garage.
got it fixed
The question asks us to complete a sentence that describes an action where the subject ("He") did not perform the action himself but arranged for someone else to do it. This type of sentence structure requires a "causative verb." Causative verbs are used when one person causes another person to do something, or causes something to happen.
The most common causative structures are:
The original sentence, "He did not manage to fix the car himself, so he _______ in the garage," clearly indicates that "He" arranged for the car to be fixed by someone else because he couldn't do it himself. The phrase "did not manage" sets the context in the past tense.
Let's examine each option in the context of the sentence and the past tense requirement:
This option uses "got" (the past tense of "get"), followed by the object "it" (referring to "the car"), and then the past participle "fixed." This perfectly matches the "get + object + past participle" causative structure in the past tense. It means "he arranged for someone else to fix the car."
Example: "He did not manage to fix the car himself, so he got it fixed in the garage." This sentence is grammatically correct and conveys the intended meaning.
This is a present participle form. If used, the sentence would need a helping verb, e.g., "He was getting it fixed." However, the main clause "He did not manage" is in the simple past, so "getting it fixed" alone does not fit the tense or structure needed to complete the sentence naturally.
This option uses the simple present tense ("gets") and is missing the object ("it" or "the car") before the past participle. "He gets fixed" implies that *he* is the one being fixed, which is incorrect in this context. If it were "He gets it fixed," it would be a habitual action in the present tense, which doesn't fit the past tense context of the first part of the sentence ("did not manage").
While "got" is past tense and "fixed" is a past participle, this option is missing the object "it" (the car). "He got fixed" would mean *he* was repaired, which is not the meaning intended. The subject "He" caused the car to be fixed, not himself. Therefore, the object of the action (the car) must be explicitly stated or implied by "it."
Based on the analysis, "got it fixed" is the only option that correctly forms a past tense causative verb structure, where "He" arranged for the car to be repaired by someone else. The sentence is in the past tense because of "did not manage," and "got it fixed" aligns perfectly with this tense and the required causative meaning.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”
My old teacher gave many poor students money in spite of he was poor.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
You should to read the newspaper regularly if you want to be well-informed.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
If he had listening to me he would not have got lost.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”
He asked for a bank loan also he didn't have sufficient resources.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
I went to the shop to buy some stationeries .