Statement I: Metals low in the activity series can be obtained from their oxides without using any reducing agent.
Statement II: Heating alone is enough to reduce the oxides of these metals to pure metal.
This question explores the relationship between a metal's position in the activity series and how its oxide can be reduced to obtain the pure metal. Let's break down the two statements.
The activity series (or reactivity series) of metals arranges metals based on their reactivity. Metals that are very low in this series, such as mercury (Hg), silver (Ag), and gold (Au), are quite unreactive.
Therefore, Statement I, stating that metals low in the activity series can be obtained from their oxides without using any specific reducing agent (implying a chemical reducing agent is not needed), is accurate.
Statement II builds upon the idea presented in Statement I. It specifically mentions that heating alone is sufficient for the reduction of oxides of these less reactive metals.
$2\text{HgO(s)} \xrightarrow{\Delta} 2\text{Hg(l)} + \text{O}_2\text{(g)}$
In this reaction, the heat ($\Delta$) is sufficient to break down HgO into pure mercury (Hg) and oxygen gas (O₂). No other reducing agent is added.Thus, Statement II is also accurate, as heating is indeed the method used to reduce these specific metal oxides back to their pure metallic form.
Both statements accurately describe the chemical behavior of metals situated low in the reactivity series concerning their oxides. Their oxides are unstable and can be decomposed into the metal and oxygen simply by heating.
Select the option that is true regarding the following two statements labelled Assertion (A) and Reason (R).
Assertion (A): Copper wire in iron sulphate solution shows no visible reaction.
Reason (R): Copper is less reactive than iron.