Heading: Analysis of J.C. Alexander's Critique of New Left Marxism

Assertion (A) Analysis: J.C. Alexander's Dissatisfaction

Jeffrey C. Alexander, a key sociologist, developed critical perspectives on various intellectual movements. His work suggests a move away from certain radical elements prevalent in the New Left milieu. Thus, the assertion that J.C. Alexander became dissatisfied with New Left Marxism is considered true.

Reason (R) Analysis: New Left's Turn Towards Violence

The New Left movement, particularly in its more radical phases during the 1960s and 1970s, included factions that embraced confrontational tactics and, in some instances, revolutionary or violent approaches to social and political change. This aspect of the movement generated significant debate and concern among intellectuals.

Historians and theorists note that the radicalization and perceived embrace of violence by segments of the New Left were indeed factors that unsettled many, including scholars seeking more established theoretical frameworks.

Therefore, the reason that the New Left's turn towards violence frightened Alexander is considered true.

Relationship Between Assertion (A) and Reason (R)

Alexander's dissatisfaction with New Left Marxism was linked to his concerns about its theoretical underpinnings and practical implications. The movement's shift towards radicalism and potential violence represented a departure from more moderate or reconstructive social analysis, which aligns with Alexander's theoretical trajectory. His critiques often focused on the perceived limitations and excesses of radical ideologies.

Consequently, the factors described in Reason (R) serve as a direct explanation for the dissatisfaction mentioned in Assertion (A).

Conclusion

Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are factually correct statements regarding J.C. Alexander's intellectual engagement with the New Left. Furthermore, Reason (R) provides the specific cause for the dissatisfaction stated in Assertion (A).

Therefore, the correct option is that both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).