All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

For determining the probability of falling of a ceiling fan, which definition of probability can be applied?

This question was previously asked in
SSC CGL 2022 Tier-II (Paper 2 JSO) Previous Year Paper (04-Mar-2023)
The correct answer is

Empirical definition

Determining the Probability of a Ceiling Fan Falling

When we talk about the probability of something happening, like a ceiling fan falling, we need a way to measure how likely that event is. Different definitions of probability exist, and the one we choose depends on the nature of the event.

Let's consider the event: a ceiling fan falling. Is this something we can predict perfectly based on logical reasoning or a set of equally likely outcomes?

Analyzing Probability Definitions

We can look at the common definitions of probability:

  • Classical Probability: This definition applies when all possible outcomes of an experiment are equally likely. For example, the probability of getting a head when flipping a fair coin is $1/2$ because there are two equally likely outcomes (head or tail). Can we say that a ceiling fan either falls or it doesn't, and these two outcomes are equally likely? Clearly not. The classical definition is not suitable for events like a ceiling fan falling.
  • Mathematical Probability / Axiomatic Probability: These are more formal, theoretical definitions based on set theory and axioms. While fundamental in advanced probability theory, they define probability based on a set of rules (axioms) rather than providing a direct method for calculating the probability of a real-world, unpredictable event like a specific ceiling fan falling, especially when the underlying sample space isn't easily defined by equally likely events.
  • Empirical Probability: Also known as statistical probability or frequentist probability. This definition is based on observing how often an event occurs in a large number of trials or observations. The probability of an event is estimated as the ratio of the number of times the event occurred to the total number of trials.

Applying Empirical Probability to the Ceiling Fan Scenario

The probability of a ceiling fan falling is not something we can calculate theoretically from first principles or assume equally likely outcomes. Instead, we would need to gather data. Imagine observing a large number of ceiling fans over a long period. We would count how many fans were installed and how many of those fans eventually fell during that period due to structural failure (excluding external forces like earthquakes, etc., if we define the event narrowly). The empirical probability of a ceiling fan falling would then be calculated as:

$$P(\text{Fan Falling}) \approx \frac{\text{Number of fans that fell}}{\text{Total number of fans observed}}$$

This calculation relies on past observations or experiments, which is the core idea behind the empirical definition of probability. It's how probabilities for many real-world events, like equipment failure rates, insurance risks, or weather predictions, are determined.

Therefore, for determining the probability of falling of a ceiling fan, the empirical definition of probability is the most appropriate approach because it is based on observable data and frequency of occurrence in real-world conditions.

Revision Table: Probability Definitions

Definition Basis Applicability
Classical Equally likely outcomes Games of chance (coins, dice), simple experiments
Empirical Observed frequency in trials Real-world events (failures, weather, lifespan)
Axiomatic / Mathematical Set theory, Axioms Theoretical foundation, complex probability spaces

Additional Information: Why Other Definitions Don't Fit

Let's quickly revisit why the other definitions aren't suitable for the probability of a ceiling fan falling:

  • Classical: Assumes each fan is either 'fall-prone' or 'not fall-prone' with equal likelihood, which ignores manufacturing quality, installation correctness, age, usage, etc.
  • Mathematical/Axiomatic: While providing the rules probability must follow, they don't tell us how to assign the initial probabilities for specific complex real-world events like a fan falling without resorting to empirical data or subjective judgment. They are the framework, but empirical data often provides the values within that framework for such events.

The empirical definition directly addresses the need to use historical data and observation to estimate the likelihood of events that don't fit the simple, idealized models of classical probability.

Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. Which of the following is a merit of data tabulation?

  2. In seasonal variations, the duration of time is not more than:

  3. If a constant is added to each observation of a data set, then which of the following measures of dispersion will change?  

  4. Which of the following is NOT true for seasonal variation?

  5. The analysis of variance technique was developed by:  

  6. For the series 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, the minimum possible value of \(\rm \Sigma_{i=1}^n(x_i-A)^2\) can be attained at: 

  7. Suppose that a sample of 100 independent draws from a normal distribution having unknown mean μ and known variance σ2 = 1 is observed. If the sample mean is 5, then the 95% confidence interval for μ is:  

  8. Consider the following ANOVA table.

    Source of variationDegrees of freedomThe sum of Squares (SS)Mean SSF Ratio
    Treatmentsabc5
    Error12d20
    Total15540

    The values of a, b, c and d are, respectively: 
  9. If the mean, mode and quartile deviation of a distribution is 2, 7 and 3, respectively, then Karl Pearson's coefficient of skewness is given by:  

  10. The component containing the overall upward or downward pattern of the data in an annual time series is:


Important Questions from Statistics

  1. Methods of presentation of data are:

  2. Consider 35 i.i.d. observations X1, X2, ...., X15 and Y1, Y2, ..., Y20. Let R be the Wilcoxon's rank sum statistic based on the ranks of the X' s in the combined sample. Then the expected value of R is

  3. Let I, J > 5. Consider two-way ANOVA, where the observations satisfy the linear model

    yij = α + βi + γj + εij, 1 ≤ i ≤ I, 1 ≤ j ≤ J 

    E(εij) = 0, Var(εij) = σ2, \(\sum_{i=1}^{!} β_i=\sum_{j=1}^j γ_j=0 .\)

    In this set - up

  4. Let X1,X2,...,Xn be a random sample from exponential distribution with mean θ. Which of the following is NOT a sufficient statistic for θ?

  5. A newly developed algorithm for random number generation needs to be tested. The first step is to check whether the sequence of numbers generated can be considered a random sample from the uniform distribution on the interval (0, 1). Which of the following is an appropriate nonparametric test?

Need Expert Advice?
Upcoming Exams
SSC CPO
November 23, 2026
SSC CHSL
November 30, 2026
Test Series
SSC CGL img
SSC
SSC CGL (Tier I + Tier II) 2026 Mock Test Series - Latest Pattern
2509 Tests 6 Tests Free
8804 Attempts
4.2(941)
English, Hindi

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App