Directions: The questions has a statement followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to decide which of the conclusions follows from the given statement and mark your answer as Statement: Mr A is not among the candidates shortlisted for the post of vice chancellor of a university Conclusions : I) Mr. A will be elected as Vice - chancellor II) Mr. A will not be considered for the post of Vice-chancellor
The initial statement provides crucial information: "Mr A is not among the candidates shortlisted for the post of vice chancellor of a university." This tells us that Mr. A has not been selected as part of the group being actively considered for the position.
Conclusion I suggests: "Mr. A will be elected as Vice - chancellor."
Explanation: Election to a position like Vice-Chancellor typically requires a candidate to be considered through a formal process, which usually starts with shortlisting. The statement explicitly mentions that Mr. A is *not* on the shortlist. If someone is not even considered (not shortlisted), they cannot be elected. Therefore, this conclusion contradicts the initial statement and does not logically follow.
Conclusion II states: "Mr. A will not be considered for the post of Vice-chancellor."
Explanation: Being "shortlisted" means being selected to be part of the group that will be considered for the final selection or election. Since the statement clearly says Mr. A is *not* among the shortlisted candidates, it directly implies that he is excluded from the consideration process for the Vice-Chancellor role. This conclusion is a direct logical inference from the statement.
Comparing the conclusions with the statement:
Thus, only Conclusion II logically follows from the given statement.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All A are B.
II. Some B are C.
Conclusions:
I. Some A are C.
II. Some A are not C.
III. Some A are B.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance from commonly established facts, decide which of the conclusions from / logically follows these statements.
Statement:
Poverty makes man hardworking.
Hardworking people are not poor.
Conclusion:
I. A person must be poor to be hardworking.
II. Diligence helps to remove poverty.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
A asked C, "What time is it now?" Is it half past two? ''
Conclusions:
1. A wants to go to lunch.
2. A wants to confirm what the time is because his watch is off.
In the question one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement : 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie.
Conclusion I : Manisha went to watch the movie.
Conclusion II : Manisha did not go to watch the movie.
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement 1 : All schools are books.
Statement 2 : No books are papers.
Conclusion I : No schools are books.
Conclusion II : Some books are schools.