Direction for Reading Comprehension: The passages given here are followed by some questions that have four answer choices; read the passage carefully and pick the option whose answer best aligns with the passage.
I have elaborated . . . a framework for analyzing the contradictory pulls on [Indian] nationalist ideology in its struggle against the dominance of colonialism and the resolution it offered to those contradictions. Briefly, this resolution was built around a separation of the domain of culture into two spheres—the material and the spiritual. It was in the material sphere that the claims of Western civilization were the most powerful. Science, technology, rational forms of economic organization, modern methods of statecraft—these had given the European countries the strength to subjugate the non-European people . . . To overcome this domination, the colonized people had to learn those superior techniques of organizing material life and incorporate them within their own cultures. . . . But this could not mean the imitation of the West in every aspect of life, for then the very distinction between the West and the East would vanish—the self-identity of national culture would itself be threatened. . . . The discourse of nationalism shows that the material/spiritual distinction was condensed into an analogous, but ideologically far more powerful, dichotomy: that between the outer and the inner. . . . Applying the inner/outer distinction to the matter of concrete day-to-day living separates the social space into ghar and bāhir, the home and the world. The world is the external, the domain of the material; the home represents one’s inner spiritual self, one’s true identity. The world is a treacherous terrain of the pursuit of material interests, where practical considerations reign supreme. It is also typically the domain of the male. The home in its essence must remain unaffected by the profane activities of the material world—and woman is its representation. And so one gets an identification of social roles by gender to correspond with the separation of the social space into ghar and bāhir. . . .
The colonial situation, and the ideological response of nationalism to the critique of Indian tradition, introduced an entirely new substance to [these dichotomies] and effected their transformation. The material/spiritual dichotomy, to which the terms world and home corresponded, had acquired . . . a very special significance in the nationalist mind. The world was where the European power had challenged the non-European peoples and, by virtue of its superior material culture, had subjugated them. But, the nationalists asserted, it had failed to colonize the inner, essential, identity of the East which lay in its distinctive, and superior, spiritual culture. . . . [I]n the entire phase of the national struggle, the crucial need was to protect, preserve and strengthen the inner core of the national culture, its spiritual essence. . .
Once we match this new meaning of the home/world dichotomy with the identification of social roles by gender, we get the ideological framework within which nationalism answered the women’s question. It would be a grave error to see in this, as liberals are apt to in their despair at the many marks of social conservatism in nationalist practice, a total rejection of the West. Quite the contrary: the nationalist paradigm in fact supplied an ideological principle of selection.
Despite its fight against colonial domination, Indian nationalism had to borrow from the coloniser in the material sphere.
"Contradictory pulls" means two demands working against each other within nationalist ideology.
The passage says the colonised people, to overcome domination, "had to learn those superior techniques of organizing material life and incorporate them". Yet "this could not mean the imitation of the West in every aspect of life", or national self-identity would be threatened. So nationalism resisted the coloniser while borrowing from it in the material sphere.
Fighting despite technological inferiority: states a weakness, not the tension between resisting and borrowing.
Borrowing in the spiritual sphere: the spiritual sphere is precisely what had to be protected from the West.
Fighting despite spiritual superiority: this is the nationalist claim, but superiority and resistance do not pull against each other.
The pull is between resisting the coloniser and borrowing its material techniques.
Hence, Despite its fight against colonial domination, Indian nationalism had to borrow from the coloniser in the material sphere.
Indian nationalist discourses reaffirmed traditional gender roles for Indian women.
The liberal view appears in one line near the end: liberals, "in their despair at the many marks of social conservatism in nationalist practice", see a total rejection of the West.
The social conservatism refers to the gender framework just described: the home is the inner, spiritual domain and "woman is its representation", while the world is the male domain. Liberals thus read nationalism as reaffirming traditional roles for women.
Distinguishing the material from the spiritual: this is the author's analysis of nationalism, not the liberal perception.
Supplying an ideological principle of selection: this is the author's rebuttal to the liberals.
Embracing colonial changes to women's roles: the opposite of the conservatism liberals despair at.
Liberals perceive nationalism as socially conservative on gender.
Hence, Indian nationalist discourses reaffirmed traditional gender roles for Indian women.
The colonial period saw the hybridisation of Indian culture in all realms as it came in contact with British/European culture.
To weaken an argument, find a fact that contradicts its central claim.
The author claims nationalism split culture into an outer, material world, where Western techniques were adopted, and an inner, spiritual home that "must remain unaffected by the profane activities of the material world" and that the coloniser "had failed to colonize". If Indian culture was hybridised in all realms, the inner sphere was also changed, and the claimed separation collapses. This weakens the argument.
Nationalists rejecting English education for women: fits the conservatism about women and the home, so it supports the passage.
The Industrial Revolution shaping Britain's economic strength: matches the passage's view that material culture gave Europe its power.
Colonial modernity shaping anti-colonial nationalism: agrees with the passage, which says the colonial situation transformed the dichotomies.
Only cultural mixing in every realm undercuts the inner/outer divide.
Hence, The colonial period saw the hybridisation of Indian culture in all realms as it came in contact with British/European culture.
represented a continuation of age-old oppositions in Indian culture.
In an EXCEPT question, three statements are backed by the passage and one is not.
Premise of the ghar/bāhir dichotomy: the material/spiritual split was condensed into inner/outer, and applying that to daily life "separates the social space into ghar and bāhir". True.
Safeguarding nationalist identity: the need was "to protect, preserve and strengthen the inner core of the national culture, its spiritual essence", the part the West had failed to colonise. True.
Less ideologically powerful than inner/outer: the material/spiritual split was condensed into "an analogous, but ideologically far more powerful, dichotomy". True.
A continuation of age-old oppositions: the colonial situation "introduced an entirely new substance to [these dichotomies] and effected their transformation". So it was a transformation, not a continuation. Not true.
The dichotomy was reshaped, not carried over unchanged.
Hence, represented a continuation of age-old oppositions in Indian culture.
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: "Everything is old-world, traditional techniques from Mexico," Ava emphasizes.
Paragraph: The sisters embrace the ways their great-grandfather built and repaired instruments. ____(1) ____. When crafting a Mexican guitarrón used in mariachi music, they use tacote wood for the top of the instrument. Once the wood is cut, they carve the neck and heel from a single block using tools like hand saws, chisels and sandpaper rather than modern power tools — and believe that this traditional method improves the tone of the instrument. ____(2) ____. Their store has a three-year waitlist for instruments that take months to create. ____(3) ____. The family's artisanship has attracted stars like Los Lobos, who own custom guitars made by all three generations of the Delgado family. ____(4) ____. For the sisters, involvement in the family business started at an early age. They each built their first instruments at age 9.
In the dynamic realm of creativity, artists often find themselves at the crossroads between drawing inspiration from diverse cultures and inadvertently crossing into the territory of cultural appropriation. Inspiration is the lifeblood of creativity, driving artists to create works that resonate across borders. The globalized nature of the modern world invites artists to draw from a vast array of cultural influences. When approached respectfully, inspiration becomes a bridge, fostering understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity. However, the line between inspiration and cultural appropriation can be thin and easily blurred. Cultural appropriation occurs when elements from a particular culture are borrowed without proper understanding, respect, or acknowledgment. This leads to the commodification of sacred symbols, the reinforcement of stereotypes, and the erasure of the cultural context from which these elements originated. It’s essential to recognize that the impact of cultural appropriation extends beyond the realm of artistic expression, influencing societal perceptions and perpetuating power imbalances.
Zombie cells may contribute to age-related chronic inflammation: this finding could help scientists understand more about the aging process and why the immune system becomes less effective as we get older. Zombie or “senescent” cells are damaged cells that can no longer divide and grow like normal cells. Scientists think that these cells can contribute to chronic health problems when they accumulate in the body. In younger people, the immune system is more effective at clearing senescent cells from the body through a process called apoptosis, but as we age this process becomes less efficient. As a result, there is an accumulation of senescent cells in different organs in the body, either through increased production or reduced clearance by the immune system. The zombie cells continue to use energy though they do not divide, and often secrete chemicals that cause inflammation, which if persistent for longer periods of time can damage healthy cells leading to chronic diseases.
Identify the odd sentence out and key in the number of that sentence as your answer.
Identify the odd sentence out and key in the number of that sentence as your answer.
The last paragraph of the passage refers to “middle-class, white, professional men”. Which one of the following qualities best describes the connection among them?
Study the following sets of concepts and identify the set that is conceptually closest to the concerns and arguments of the passage.
According to the passage, who or what was an “alienist”?
“Conversely, when a defendant struck officials as unlike themselves, whether by dint of disease, gender, confession, or race, the precariousness of judgments about mental state was exposed.” Which one of the following best describes the use of the word “confession” in this sentence?
According to the incentive or moral hazard argument, which one of the designs below is most consistent with the claim that some inequality can raise growth?