Data on ratings of hotels in a city is measured on
Ordinal scale
The question asks about the type of measurement scale used for collecting data on hotel ratings in a city. Data can be classified into different types based on how it is measured, and these types correspond to different measurement scales used in statistics.
There are four main scales of measurement:
Let's briefly look at each scale to understand their properties:
Hotel ratings are typically given using stars (e.g., 1-star, 2-star, 3-star, 4-star, 5-star) or categories (e.g., Poor, Fair, Good, Very Good, Excellent). Let's consider the star rating system:
However, the difference in quality or features between a 2-star and a 3-star hotel might not be the same as the difference between a 4-star and a 5-star hotel. The numerical values (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) represent ranks, not equal intervals of a measured property. A 4-star hotel is not necessarily twice as good as a 2-star hotel, and a 0-star rating doesn't represent a complete absence of a hotel (though it might represent a very low quality). Because the ratings provide a rank order but the intervals between ranks are not quantifiable or equal, hotel rating data fits the definition of an Ordinal scale.
| Scale | Properties | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal | Categories, no order | Gender, Hair Color |
| Ordinal | Categories with order, unequal intervals | Rankings, Satisfaction Levels, Hotel Ratings |
| Interval | Ordered, equal intervals, no true zero | Temperature (°C, °F) |
| Ratio | Ordered, equal intervals, true zero | Height, Weight, Age |
Therefore, data on ratings of hotels, such as star ratings or categorical quality levels, is measured on an Ordinal scale because it provides a ranking or order of quality without specifying the exact magnitude of the difference between rating levels.
Understanding the different measurement scales is crucial in statistics as it determines the types of statistical analyses that can be appropriately performed on the data.
Choosing the correct measurement scale is important for selecting appropriate statistical methods. Using a method suitable for a higher-level scale (like Interval or Ratio) on lower-level data (like Nominal or Ordinal) can lead to incorrect conclusions. For example, calculating the average (mean) of nominal data like zip codes doesn't make sense. While you can calculate the mean of ordinal data, the result might be misleading because the intervals are not equal. Therefore, recognizing that hotel ratings are ordinal helps in choosing suitable summary statistics and statistical tests for analyzing hotel rating data.
Diagrammatic representation of data includes which of the following?
1. Bar diagram
2. Pie-diagram
3. Pictogram
Select the correct answer using the code given below:The data collected from which one of the following methods isnot a primary data?
As the number of observations and classes increases, the shape of a frequency polygon
Consider the following LPP.:
Max Z = 15x 1 + 10x 2
Subject to the constraints
4x 1 + 6x 2 ≤ 360
3x 1 + 0x 2 ≤ 180
0x 1 + 5x 2 ≤ 200
x 1, x 2 ≥ 0
The solution of the LPP using Graphical solution-technique is :
A graph of a cumulative frequency distribution is called :
Which of the following is not an example of compressed data?
A cumulative frequency distribution is given below
Class | 60-62 | 63-65 | 66-68 | 69-71 | 72-74 |
Cumulative frequency | 3 | 20 | 36 | 48 | 50 |
Which one of the following class has maximum frequency?
The measure of the central tendency is given by the X-coordinate of the point of intersection of the more than ogive and less than ogive is: