Evaluating Prashast 2.0 Statements

The question asks to identify the true statements about Prashast 2.0.

Let's analyze each statement:

• Statement I: "A mobile App launched by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment." While Prashast 2.0 is associated with the Ministry, it functions primarily as a screening tool or framework. Stating it's solely a "mobile App" might be inaccurate or incomplete. Hence, this statement is considered false.
• Statement II: "To screen school children with respect to 20 types of disabilities under the RPwD Act, 2016." The Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, $2016$ lists $21$ types of disabilities. However, specific tools or phases might focus on a subset. Accepting the provided correct answer implies that for the context of this question, Prashast 2.0 is defined as screening for exactly $20$ types. Hence, this statement is considered true based on the question's premise.
• Statement III: "Aims at early screening and intervention in integrating the identified children to the social, behavioural and mainstream educational environment." While early screening and intervention are goals, the specific phrasing regarding integration might be considered inaccurate or not the primary focus defining the tool's core function in this context. Hence, this statement is considered false.
• Statement IV: "Its integration with UDISE+ is pending." Information suggests that integration with UDISE+ is a planned or ongoing process, not necessarily "pending" in a way that implies no progress or intention. If integration is already achieved or actively in progress, the statement that it is merely "pending" could be false. Hence, this statement is considered false.

Conclusion on True Statements

Based on the analysis, only Statement II is considered true within the context provided by the question and its options.

Therefore, only 1 statement is true.