Statement Analysis for Labour Law Question

This solution analyzes the correctness of three statements related to labour law and identifies the valid ones.

Statement I Analysis: Union Grievance Procedures

Statement: Union grievance procedures can differ from firm to firm.

Reasoning: Grievance procedures are typically established through collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) between specific unions and employers. Since each CBA is unique and negotiated independently, the resulting grievance procedures vary significantly across different firms and unions. Therefore, this statement is correct.

Statement II Analysis: Peaceful Picketing

Statement: Peaceful picketing during a strike of workers is lawful.

Reasoning: Under labour laws like the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) in the U.S., workers have the right to strike and engage in related activities. Peaceful picketing is generally considered a lawful exercise of this right, allowing striking workers to communicate their dispute to the public and potential replacement workers. Therefore, this statement is correct.

Statement III Analysis: NLRB Role

Statement: The National Labour Relations Board (NLRB) is an agency created by the Wagner Act to investigate about the minimum wages in all business units.

Reasoning: The Wagner Act (NLRA) did establish the National Labour Relations Board (NLRB). However, the NLRB's primary function is to protect employees' rights to organize, bargain collectively, and act concertedly, and to prevent unfair labour practices. It does *not* investigate minimum wage issues. Minimum wage standards are typically enforced by the Department of Labor under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Therefore, this statement is incorrect.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis:

• Statement I is correct.
• Statement II is correct.
• Statement III is incorrect.

Thus, only statements I and II are correct.

Correct Option: 1. Only statements I and II are correct.