Consider the following statements about the Linguistic Reorganization of the States: 1. Gandhiji, in 1948, had argued for the reorganization of provinces on a linguistic basis Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
2. The Constituent Assembly recommended it to be incorporated in the Constitution of India
Understanding Linguistic Reorganization of States
This question delves into the historical context of the linguistic reorganization of states in India, focusing on specific viewpoints from 1948.
Analyzing Statement 1: Gandhiji's Viewpoint
Statement 1 claims that Gandhiji, in 1948, argued for the reorganization of provinces on a linguistic basis.
- Gandhiji was known to support the idea of provinces being organized according to linguistic groups, seeing it as a natural way to foster cultural and administrative unity.
- While he expressed concerns about the potential for division and the timing of such reorganization immediately after the trauma of the partition in 1948, his fundamental belief in the principle of linguistic provinces remained.
- Historical records and his writings suggest he did advocate for this principle, even amidst the complex post-partition political climate. Therefore, this statement is considered factually correct in the context of his general advocacy.
Analyzing Statement 2: Constituent Assembly's Recommendation
Statement 2 suggests that the Constituent Assembly recommended incorporating linguistic reorganization into the Constitution of India.
- The Constituent Assembly, especially in the immediate aftermath of India's independence and partition, was cautious about reorganizing states purely on a linguistic basis.
- Concerns about national unity, security, and administrative stability were paramount.
- Various committees, like the JVP Committee (formed by Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabhbhai Patel, and Pattabhi Sitaramayya), recommended that the time was not suitable for large-scale linguistic reorganization.
- While the idea was debated, the Constituent Assembly did not make a definitive recommendation to incorporate it directly or immediately into the Constitution. The major push for linguistic reorganization came later with the States Reorganisation Act of 1956, based on the recommendations of the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC).
- Thus, this statement is factually incorrect.
Conclusion on Statements
Based on the analysis:
- Statement 1 is correct.
- Statement 2 is incorrect.
Therefore, only statement 1 is correct.
Final Answer Derivation
Since only the first statement accurately reflects historical viewpoints on the linguistic reorganization of states around 1948, the correct option is the one that includes '1 only'.
Similar Questions
- Nkrumah was one of the five leaders, who comprised the core of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). He was the leader of which country in Africa?
Pochampally in Nalgonda district of Telengana became famous in April, 1951 because
Acharya Vinoba Bhave received the first donation of land under the Bhoodan Movement at
Which one of the following documents was titled as 'Towards Faster and More Inclusive Growth'?
Important Questions from Post Independence Scenario
With reference to the Union Government, consider the following statements :
1. N. Gopalaswamy Iyengar Committee suggested that a minister and a secretary be designated solely for pursuing the subject of administrative reform and promoting it.
2. In 1970, the Department of Personnel was constituted on the recommendation of the Administrative Reforms Commission, 1966, and this was placed under the Prime Minister's charge.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
How many times a state of emergency has been declared in India since independence?
The term 'Panchsheel' is associated with which of the following options?
Rajasthan Union was formed on 25 th March, 1948. Who was the head (Maharaj Pramukh) of it?
Who among the following advocated party-less democracy in India?
