Consider the following methods: M 1: mean of maximum M 2: Centre of area M 3: Height method
M 1, M 2and M 3
Defuzzification is a crucial step in a fuzzy logic system. After the fuzzy inference process determines the fuzzy output, defuzzification converts this fuzzy output into a single, crisp (non-fuzzy) value. This crisp value is typically used to drive an action, for example, controlling a motor speed or setting a temperature. Several methods exist for defuzzification, each with its own characteristics and computational complexity.
Let's examine the methods mentioned in the question:
The Mean of Maximum (MOM) method calculates the average of all the values in the universe of discourse that have the maximum membership degree in the output fuzzy set.
The Centre of Area (COA), also known as the Centre of Gravity (COG), is one of the most widely used defuzzification methods. It calculates the centroid of the area under the membership function of the output fuzzy set.
The "Height method" can refer to various approaches, but in the context of typical defuzzification methods listed alongside MOM and COA, it often relates to selecting a crisp value based on the maximum height or peak(s) of the output fuzzy set. Methods like the First of Maximum (FOM) or Last of Maximum (LOM) fall into this category, where a single value with the maximum membership degree is chosen (e.g., the smallest or largest value within the plateau of maximum membership). Another interpretation can relate to methods considering the height of truncated membership functions in specific fuzzy inference systems. Regardless of the specific variant, it is a method used to obtain a single crisp value from a fuzzy set.
Based on the standard definitions and common methods used in fuzzy logic systems, the Mean of Maximum (M1), Centre of Area (M2), and methods related to the Height/peak of the output fuzzy set (M3, often represented by FOM/LOM or similar) are all recognized techniques for defuzzification. They all serve the purpose of transforming a fuzzy output into a single crisp value.
Therefore, all three methods listed (M1, M2, and M3) are indeed defuzzification methods.
| Method | Description | Classification |
|---|---|---|
| M1: Mean of Maximum (MOM) | Average of values with maximum membership. | Defuzzification Method |
| M2: Centre of Area (COA) | Centroid of the area under the membership function. | Defuzzification Method |
| M3: Height Method (e.g., FOM/LOM) | Selection based on maximum membership value(s). | Defuzzification Method |
| Concept | Brief Explanation |
|---|---|
| Defuzzification | Converting a fuzzy set (fuzzy output) to a single crisp value. |
| Fuzzy Output | The result of the fuzzy inference process, represented as a fuzzy set. |
| Crisp Value | A single, exact numerical value. |
Besides the methods listed, other defuzzification techniques include:
The choice of defuzzification method depends on factors like the required precision, computational resources, and the desired behavior of the system.
Let A α0 denotes the α-cut of a fuzzy set A at α 0. If α 1 < α 2, then
Consider the following models:
M 1: Mamdani model
M 2: Takagi – Sugeno-Kang model
M 3: Kosko’s additive model (SAM)
Which of the following option contains examples of additive rule model?A fuzzy conjunction operator denoted as t(x,y) and fuzzy disjunction operator denoted as s(x,Y) form dual pair if they satisfy the condition:
A fuzzy conjunction operators, t(x, y), and a fuzzy disjunction operator, s(x, y), form a pair if they satisfy:
t(x, y) = 1 – s(1 – x, 1 - y).
If \(t\left( {x,\;y} \right) = \frac{{xy}}{{\left( {x + y - xy} \right)}}\) then s(x, y) is given byConsider a Takagi - Sugeno - Kanga (TSK) Model consisting of rules of the form :
If x 1 is A i1 and ... and x r is A ir
THEN y = f i (x 1, x 2, ...., x r) = b i0 + b i1 x1 + b ir xr
assume, α i is the matching degree of rule i, then the total output of the model is given by :