1. Governor is state's constitutional head.
2. He acts solely on Council's advice.
Which of teh above statements holds true regarding Governor's executive powers?
The question asks us to evaluate two statements concerning the executive powers of the Governor in an Indian state. Let's break down each statement to see if it accurately reflects the constitutional position.
This statement is true. The Governor is appointed by the President and serves as the head of the state's executive branch. However, most of the Governor's executive functions are performed on the advice of the Council of Ministers headed by the Chief Minister. Therefore, the Governor is considered the nominal or constitutional head, acting as the link between the state government and the central government (represented by the President).
This statement is not entirely true. While Article 163(1) of the Constitution states that the Governor shall act according to the advice of the Council of Ministers, it also includes a crucial provision: "...except in so far as he is by this Constitution required to act in his discretion." This means there are certain matters where the Governor can exercise his judgment independently, without the advice of the Council of Ministers. Examples include:
Because the Governor has these discretionary powers and doesn't act solely on the Council's advice in all matters, this statement is considered inaccurate.
Based on the analysis:
Therefore, only the first statement holds true regarding the Governor's executive powers.
Select the most appropriate option to improve the bold part of the sentence.
The manager discussed on the issue in detail.