All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Choose the explanation(s) for negative Eu anomalies in upper crustal rocks like granite and granodiorite.

The question asks for explanations for negative Europium (Eu) anomalies observed in upper crustal rocks such as granite and granodiorite. A negative Eu anomaly on a chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) diagram indicates that the rock contains less Eu than expected relative to its neighboring REEs (Samarium, Sm, and Gadolinium, Gd).

Understanding Eu Anomalies in Granite

Negative Eu anomalies in felsic rocks like granite and granodiorite typically arise from processes occurring during magma evolution, specifically fractional crystallization.

Reasoning for Correct Options

  • Option A: These rocks are end-products of magmatic differentiation
    Granites and granodiorites are often formed late in the sequence of magmatic differentiation. Fractional crystallization removes certain elements and minerals, leading to changes in the composition of the remaining melt. Eu behaves differently from other lanthanides because it can exist as Eu2+ (similar in size to Ca2+) in addition to Eu3+. Plagioclase feldspar, a common mineral in felsic magmas, preferentially incorporates Eu2+. As plagioclase crystallizes and is removed from the magma, the remaining melt becomes depleted in Eu, resulting in a negative Eu anomaly in the rocks (like granite) that crystallize from this evolved melt. This explanation aligns with the concept of magmatic differentiation.
  • Option D: The melt residues contain plagioclase which are enriched in Eu
    This statement refers to the minerals that crystallize out of the magma (melt residues in the context of fractionation). Plagioclase feldspar strongly prefers to incorporate Eu2+ during crystallization compared to other REEs. When plagioclase crystallizes and is removed from the magma, it takes Eu with it. Consequently, the remaining liquid (which eventually forms the granite or granodiorite) becomes relatively depleted in Eu, leading to the observed negative Eu anomaly.

Explanation for Incorrect Options

  • Option B: These rocks were formed by melting of the mantle, which was already depleted in Eu
    Upper crustal rocks like granite are typically formed from crustal melting or extensive fractional crystallization of mantle-derived magmas, not directly from melting of a Eu-depleted mantle source in a way that explains negative anomalies in the final product. Mantle melting usually produces more primitive compositions.
  • Option C: Most of the Eu was incorporated in other minerals
    While true in principle, Option D is more specific and accurate by identifying plagioclase as the key mineral responsible for incorporating Eu, and clarifying that this incorporation happens in the removed fractions (residues).

Therefore, the formation of granite and granodiorite as end-products of magmatic differentiation (A) and the preferential incorporation of Eu into crystallizing plagioclase (D) are the primary reasons for negative Eu anomalies in these rocks.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Igneous Petrology (Trace Elements/Melting/Evolution)

  1. A source rock undergoes melting. Assuming batch melting, $5\%$ partial melting and bulk distribution coefficient of $0.045$, the enrichment factor ($C_L/C_o$) of Rb in the melt will be ________. (Round off to $2$ decimal places)
  2. A basaltic magma has an initial nickel concentration of 300 ppm. Olivine crystallizes from this magma by equilibrium crystallization (Case I) or fractional crystallization (Case II). Then, the absolute value of the difference between the nickel concentrations of the liquids remaining after 25% crystallization in these two cases is ________.
    (Use $K_{D,Ni}$ olivine/melt = 10).
  3. The modal abundance in an ultramafic rock and the partition coefficients of lutetium (Lu) in clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene, olivine and plagioclase are tabulated below. The bulk distribution coefficient of lutetium ($D_{Lu}$) in the ultramafic rock is ________.
    MineralModal abundance (%)Partition coefficient
    Clinopyroxene450.506
    Orthopyroxene400.42
    Olivine100.045
    Plagioclase050.019
  4. A hypothetical garnet peridotite composed of 60% olivine, 25% orthopyroxene, 10% clinopyroxene and 5% garnet undergoes 10% batch melting described by $\frac{C_L}{C_o} = \frac{1}{F+D-F*D}$ where F is degree of melting and D is bulk partition coefficient. The ratio of Ce in the melt to the original rock will be ___________ (round off to 2 decimal places). 

    (The $K_D$ values of Ce for olivine, orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene and garnet are 0.001, 0.003, 0.10 and 0.02, respectively)

  5. Choose the CORRECT combination for the following four statements. 

    Statement I: Anhydrous partial melting of peridotites produces basaltic magma. 
    Statement II: Hydrous melting of peridotites produces andesitic magma. 
    Statement III: Congruent melting of minerals produces liquids of compositions identical to the minerals. 
    Statement IV: Incongruent melting of minerals produces liquids of different compositions and new solids.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App