Assertion (A) : The volume of imports tends to be very high when there is a conjecture of high rate of economic growth and a sharp fall in the relative price of imports and vice versa. Reason (R) : High rate of growth, ceteris paribus, is associated with rise in imports and increase in the imports, ceteris paribus, is associated with a fall in the relative price of imports.
Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the right explanation of (A).
This question asks us to analyze the relationship between the volume of imports, the rate of economic growth, and the relative price of imports, based on a given Assertion (A) and Reason (R).
Assertion (A) states that the volume of imports tends to be very high when two conditions occur together:
And conversely, when growth is low or negative and import prices are high, import volume is low.
Let's break this down:
Assertion (A) claims that when these two factors—high growth (boosting overall demand) and falling relative import prices (making imports specifically more attractive)—happen simultaneously, the increase in import volume is particularly significant, leading to very high import levels. This statement aligns with basic economic principles regarding income effects (from growth) and substitution effects (from relative price changes) on demand for imports.
Reason (R) provides two separate statements about associations:
Let's examine each part of Reason (R):
Considering both parts, Reason (R) suggests that economic growth leads to more imports, and somehow this increase in imports is linked to a fall in their relative price.
We need to determine if Reason (R) provides a valid explanation for Assertion (A). Assertion (A) describes a situation where high growth *and* falling relative import prices coincide with very high import volumes.
Reason (R) offers the following connections:
Putting it together: According to R, high economic growth causes imports to rise. R further posits that this rise in imports is associated with a fall in relative import prices. Therefore, R implies that high growth leads to a situation characterized by *both* high import volumes *and* falling relative import prices. This is precisely the conjunction described in Assertion (A) as leading to very high import volumes.
Thus, Reason (R) provides a chain of association (Growth $\implies$ Imports $\implies$ Fall in Relative Price) that helps explain *why* the conditions stated in Assertion (A) occur together and lead to very high import volumes. The first part of R explains the link between growth and imports, and the second part of R suggests that the resulting increase in imports is associated with the fall in relative price, thereby explaining why both factors might be present when imports are very high.
Based on this analysis, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) appear to be correct statements within the context provided, and Reason (R) offers a plausible explanation for the situation described in Assertion (A).
Assertion (A) correctly identifies the combined effect of high economic growth and falling relative import prices on the volume of imports. Reason (R) provides two associations: growth with rising imports, and rising imports with falling relative prices. Reason (R)'s associations, taken together, explain how high growth can lead to both increased imports and falling relative import prices, thus justifying the scenario described in Assertion (A).
| Statement | Evaluation | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Assertion (A): High growth & fall in relative import price $\implies$ Very high imports. | Correct | High income from growth increases demand; lower relative price makes imports cheaper, boosting demand for imports. Combined effect is significant. |
| Reason (R) Part 1: High growth $\implies$ Rise in imports. | Correct | Strong economy means higher incomes and demand, leading to more spending on imports. |
| Reason (R) Part 2: Increase in imports $\implies$ Fall in relative price of imports. | Correct (as per the intended logic of R) | While counter-intuitive from simple supply/demand, this could be due to bulk discounts, currency appreciation driven by growth, or other complex trade dynamics. We accept this association as given in R. |
| (R) is the right explanation of (A). | Correct | R explains that high growth leads to increased imports (R1), and this increase is associated with falling relative prices (R2). This explains why high growth and falling prices coincide with high imports (A). |
| Term | Explanation | Relevance to Imports |
|---|---|---|
| Economic Growth Rate | Increase in a country's output/income over time. | Higher income typically leads to higher demand for all goods, including imports. |
| Relative Price of Imports | Price of imported goods compared to domestic goods. | If imports are cheaper relative to domestic goods, consumers/businesses substitute towards imports. |
| Volume of Imports | The total quantity or value of goods and services brought into a country from abroad. | Affected by domestic demand (influenced by growth) and relative prices. |
| Ceteris Paribus | Latin phrase meaning 'all other things being equal'. | Used to isolate the effect of one variable by assuming others are constant. |
Beyond economic growth and relative prices, several other factors influence a country's import volume:
Understanding these factors provides a more complete picture of the complex dynamics influencing a country's trade balance.
Which one is odd?
1. Economic Policies
2. Economic Planning
3. Socio-cultural factors
4. Macroeconomic scenario
Which one of the following is not the characteristic of capitalism ?