To answer this question accurately, we need to understand the specific section of the Indian Penal Code being referred to: Section 107 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Section 107 defines 'abetment' of a thing. It states that a person is said to abet the doing of a thing if they intentionally aid, by any act or illegal omission, in the doing of that thing.
Let's analyze the options provided:
- abet the doing of that thing: This directly aligns with the definition provided in Section 107 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
- be guilty of attempt: This is incorrect as attempt pertains to the steps taken to commit an offence, whereas abetment is about aiding or supporting an offence.
- be liable for offence constituted: This option is misleading because abetment doesn't automatically make a person liable for the main offence. They are liable for the offence of abetment.
- be criminal: This term is vague and does not reflect the wording or concept of abetment as per the IPC.
Therefore, the correct answer is abet the doing of that thing as per Section 107 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. This option directly matches the legal language used in the Indian Penal Code.
Important Questions from Administrative Law
As per Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, ________ shall be conclusive as to any matter thereby directly adjudicated upon between the same parties or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same title.
As per the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, the age difference required between an adoptive parent and an adoptive child of the opposite sex is:
As per Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a foreign judgment shall be conclusive as to any matter thereby directly adjudicated upon between the same parties, but it is not conclusive in which of the following cases?
As per Section 25 of the Limitation Act, 1963, when shall Right to access and use of light or air, as an easement be absolute and indefeasible?
Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which Section empowers the Court to grant interim measures of protection?
