a. Shankari Prasad Singh Dev Vs. Union of India
b. Golaknath Vs. State of Punjab
c. Keshavananda Bharti Vs. State of Kerala
d. Minerva Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Choose from the following answers :
Understanding the Chronological Order of Landmark Indian Case Laws
This solution addresses the task of arranging specific landmark case laws from India in chronological order based on their judgment year. Understanding the timeline of these crucial legal decisions is important for grasping the evolution of constitutional law in India.
Key Case Laws and Their Judgment Years
To arrange the case laws chronologically, we first need to identify the year each case was decided by the Supreme Court of India:
| Case Law Abbreviation | Full Case Name | Year of Judgment |
|---|---|---|
| a. | Shankari Prasad Singh Deo Vs. Union of India | 1951 |
| b. | Golaknath Vs. State of Punjab | 1967 |
| c. | Kesavananda Bharti Vs. State of Kerala | 1973 |
| d. | Minerva Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India | 1980 |
Arranging Case Laws Chronologically
By examining the judgment years, we can establish the correct chronological sequence:
- 1951: Shankari Prasad Singh Deo Vs. Union of India (Case a)
- 1967: Golaknath Vs. State of Punjab (Case b)
- 1973: Kesavananda Bharti Vs. State of Kerala (Case c)
- 1980: Minerva Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Case d)
Therefore, the correct chronological order of the given case laws is a, b, c, d.
Significance of the Chronological Order
Arranging these cases chronologically helps in understanding the progression of judicial thought on fundamental rights and the amending powers of Parliament under the Indian Constitution. Each case built upon, or reacted to, the principles laid down in previous judgments, shaping key constitutional doctrines like the extent of Parliament's power to amend the Constitution and the basic structure doctrine.
- Shankari Prasad (1951) upheld Parliament's power to amend Fundamental Rights.
- Golaknath (1967) took a restrictive view, stating Parliament could not amend Fundamental Rights.
- Kesavananda Bharati (1973) introduced the 'basic structure' doctrine, limiting amending powers.
- Minerva Mills (1980) further reinforced the basic structure doctrine.
Important Questions from Miscellaneous
A stone is thrown horizontally from the top of a 20 m high building with a speed of 12 m/s. It hits the ground at a distance R from the building. Taking g = 10 m/s2 and neglecting air resistance will give :
A mass is attached to a spring that hangs vertically. The extension produced in the spring is 6 cm on Earth. The acceleration due to gravity on the surface of the Moon is one-sixth of its value on the surface of the Earth. The extension of the spring on the Moon would be:
Directions: Each item in this section consists of a sentence with an underlined word followed by four words (a), (b), (c), and (d). Select the option that is opposite in meaning to the underlined word and mark your response in your Answer Sheet accordingly.
The deluge affected the population.The major source of vitamins and minerals for vegetarians is
Which of the following statements about the Deccan Riots Commission is/are correct?
1. The Commission did not hold enquiries in the districts which were not affected.
2. The Commission did record the statements of ryots, sahukars and eye-witnesses.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
