An investigator wants to conduct a study on orthopaedically handicapped children. The type of sampling to be used would be
Purposive
When conducting research, selecting the right group of participants from the larger population is crucial. This process is called sampling. Different types of sampling methods exist, each suitable for different research objectives and population characteristics. The question asks about the appropriate sampling type for a study focusing specifically on orthopaedically handicapped children.
Let's look at the sampling methods mentioned in the options:
The target population for the investigator's study is a very specific group: orthopaedically handicapped children. This is not a general population widely distributed and easily accessed with a complete list for random sampling methods like stratified sampling. Locating and recruiting participants from such a specific group often requires targeted effort and selection based on whether they fit the specific criteria defined by the researcher (i.e., being orthopaedically handicapped and possibly meeting other study requirements like age range or type of handicap).
Given the specific nature of the population, the investigator would likely use their knowledge or connect with relevant institutions (like special schools, hospitals, or NGOs) to identify and select children who fit the study's criteria. This deliberate selection based on the study's purpose and population definition aligns directly with the principles of purposive sampling.
While quota sampling *could* potentially be used *within* a purposive approach (e.g., selecting a quota of boys and girls who are orthopaedically handicapped), the initial identification and selection of this specific group of children themselves leans towards purposive selection.
Accidental sampling would not be suitable as it would rely on chance encounters and is unlikely to yield a representative sample of orthopaedically handicapped children.
Stratified sampling, while powerful for ensuring subgroup representation, is difficult to implement without a comprehensive sampling frame of all orthopaedically handicapped children, which is often unavailable.
Therefore, for a study specifically targeting orthopaedically handicapped children, purposive sampling is the most appropriate method as it allows the investigator to intentionally select participants who meet the specific criteria relevant to the study.
Based on the analysis of the population (orthopaedically handicapped children) and the characteristics of different sampling methods, purposive sampling is the most fitting approach for an investigator conducting such a study.
| Sampling Type | Category | Key Feature | Suitability for Specific Groups (like orthopaedically handicapped children) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accidental | Non-Probability | Based on convenience | Low - Unlikely to find required participants systematically |
| Quota | Non-Probability | Quota for subgroups, selection within quota often non-random | Moderate - Could be used after initial purposive selection |
| Stratified | Probability | Random selection from strata (subgroups) | Low - Requires complete population list (sampling frame), often unavailable for specific groups |
| Purposive | Non-Probability | Deliberate selection based on study purpose/criteria | High - Allows targeting of specific, hard-to-find populations |
Non-probability sampling methods, including purposive sampling, are often used in qualitative research, exploratory studies, or when studying populations where a complete list is not available. While they do not allow for generalization to the entire population in the same way as probability sampling, they are valuable for gaining in-depth understanding or studying specific phenomena within particular groups. When using non-probability sampling for studies on groups like orthopaedically handicapped children, researchers must clearly define their selection criteria and acknowledge the limitations regarding generalizability.
If a sample survey of the same 100 households is conducted in a particular village, annually for five years, the data so collected will be described as :
The element that differentiates between stratified and quota sampling techniques is
List I contains the characteristics of a validity measure and List II the type of validity. Match List I and List II and choose the correct answer from the code given below.
List I (Characteristic of validity measure) | List II (Type of validity) | ||
(a) | Measure of product or performance | (i) | Content validity |
(b) | Measure of unobservable psychological entity | (ii) | Predictive validity |
(c) | Measure of representation of substantive knowledge structure | (iii) | Concurrent validity |
(d) | Extent of agreement between two measures | (iv) | Construct validity |
Which of the following techniques is NOT covered under non-probability sampling?
Identify from the list of characteristics given below these which are related to a good hypothesis in a research:
a) Simplicity of explanation
b) Plausibility of explanation
c) Highly difficult to verify the postulated relations
d) Not related to an existing theory
e) Relationship formulated among variables having conceptual clarity
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below: