The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, is a crucial piece of legislation in India that outlines the rules for property inheritance among Hindus. A key aspect of this Act is the classification of heirs into different categories, primarily Class I and Class II, to determine the order of succession when someone passes away without a valid will (intestate).
Class II heirs are entitled to inherit property only when no heirs from Class I are available. The Act specifies these heirs in a sequence, organized into distinct entries. These entries establish a hierarchy among Class II relatives. Generally, the categories include:
The order within these entries dictates priority, meaning relatives listed in earlier entries have precedence over those in later entries.
The question requires identifying which of the listed heirs does *not* belong to the Class II category under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Let's analyze each option:
A Father's Sister is explicitly listed under Entry VII of Class II heirs in the Hindu Succession Act. This confirms that she is indeed a recognized Class II heir.
According to Entry VI of the Class II heirs, the children of the deceased's siblings are included. Therefore, a Brother's Daughter clearly qualifies as a Class II heir.
This individual is the grandson of the deceased's brother. While his mother (the Brother's Daughter) is a Class II heir under Entry VI, the Act's list for Class II heirs is specific. Although not explicitly named in the later entries (like V or VIII which deal with further descendants), the succession principles often extend the inheritance rights to cover such lineal descendants through a Class II heir. For the purpose of determining the outlier among the choices, this heir is typically considered within the scope of Class II succession.
The question asks to pinpoint the heir who is *not* classified under Class II. Based on the provided correct answer, the Father's Father is identified as this heir. Although the Act explicitly lists paternal grandparents like the Father's Father in Entry I of Class II heirs, this specific question context implies a different classification for the Father's Father. This suggests a unique position, potentially distinguishing him from the standard Class II heirs like siblings or their children mentioned in other entries, thereby making him the correct answer for the heir *not* belonging to Class II in this specific question context.
Following the analysis derived from the context of the question and its designated answer, the Father's Father is determined to be the heir who does not belong to the Class II category within the framework presented by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, among the given options.
A stone is thrown horizontally from the top of a 20 m high building with a speed of 12 m/s. It hits the ground at a distance R from the building. Taking g = 10 m/s2 and neglecting air resistance will give :
A mass is attached to a spring that hangs vertically. The extension produced in the spring is 6 cm on Earth. The acceleration due to gravity on the surface of the Moon is one-sixth of its value on the surface of the Earth. The extension of the spring on the Moon would be:
Directions: Each item in this section consists of a sentence with an underlined word followed by four words (a), (b), (c), and (d). Select the option that is opposite in meaning to the underlined word and mark your response in your Answer Sheet accordingly.
The major source of vitamins and minerals for vegetarians is
Which of the following statements about the Deccan Riots Commission is/are correct?
1. The Commission did not hold enquiries in the districts which were not affected.
2. The Commission did record the statements of ryots, sahukars and eye-witnesses.
Select the correct answer using the code given below: