A statement and two actions numbered from I and II are given below. You have to take all the information given in the statement to be true and on the basis of the information given in the statement decide which of the proposed course of action logically follows from the statement. Statement: The construction industries in North Karnataka are facing acute water shortage. Actions : I. Government should take steps to solve the water crisis. II. Construction industries should be closed to save water.
Only 1 follows
Analyzing the Statement and Actions on Water Shortage
The given statement highlights a critical issue: the construction industries in North Karnataka are facing an acute water shortage. This situation directly impacts the operation and sustainability of these industries. We need to evaluate the proposed courses of action based on whether they logically address this problem.
Let's examine each action:
Examining Action I: Government Intervention in Water Crisis
Action I: Government should take steps to solve the water crisis.
This action proposes that the government should intervene to resolve the water shortage issue in North Karnataka. The government is typically responsible for managing public resources like water and ensuring their availability, especially when a crisis affects industries and potentially the economy and employment.
- The statement identifies a 'water crisis'.
- Action I suggests the government should 'solve the water crisis'.
- This is a direct and logical response to the problem identified. Governments have the authority and resources to implement measures like improving water supply, managing demand, or finding alternative water sources to address a regional water crisis.
Therefore, Action I is a logical step to address the root cause of the problem stated: the acute water shortage.
Examining Action II: Closing Construction Industries
Action II: Construction industries should be closed to save water.
This action suggests a drastic measure: shutting down the affected industries entirely to conserve water.
- The statement focuses on the 'water shortage' affecting 'construction industries'.
- Action II proposes 'closing construction industries' to 'save water'.
- While closing industries might save some water used by them, it does not solve the underlying 'water crisis'.
- Moreover, closing industries has significant negative consequences, such as unemployment, economic loss, and halted development, which are not addressed by this action.
- It is an extreme reaction to the problem rather than a solution to the water crisis itself. A logical course of action should aim to resolve the problem with minimal negative impact where possible.
Therefore, Action II is not a logical or desirable first course of action based on the statement. It avoids tackling the water crisis and imposes severe consequences on the industries.
Conclusion: Which Action Logically Follows?
Based on the analysis, Action I directly addresses the stated problem (acute water shortage/water crisis) by suggesting a responsible authority (Government) take steps to solve it. Action II proposes an extreme measure that avoids solving the crisis and creates new problems by shutting down industries.
Thus, only Action I logically follows from the statement as a sensible course of action to tackle the water shortage affecting North Karnataka's construction industries.
The final answer is that only Action I follows.
Revision Table: Evaluating Statement and Actions
| Element | Description/Content | Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | Construction industries in North Karnataka facing acute water shortage. | Identifies a problem: water crisis affecting industries. |
| Action I | Government should take steps to solve the water crisis. | Addresses the root cause (water crisis) and proposes action by relevant authority (Government). |
| Action II | Construction industries should be closed to save water. | Does not solve the water crisis; proposes drastic measure with severe consequences (closing industries). |
| Logical Flow | Action I logically follows as a solution to the crisis. Action II is an extreme reaction. |
Additional Information: Understanding Courses of Action
In questions involving statements and courses of action, the goal is to determine which proposed action is a practical, feasible, and logical step to deal with the situation described in the statement. A logical course of action should ideally:
- Address the problem or situation directly.
- Be practicable and implementable.
- Be a reasonable response, avoiding unnecessary or extreme measures.
- Aim to resolve the problem or mitigate its negative effects.
When evaluating actions, consider the potential positive and negative consequences of each action and whether it genuinely addresses the core issue presented in the statement. Closing industries, as suggested in Action II, is usually a last resort with significant societal impact and doesn't address the underlying resource shortage problem itself.
Important Questions from Course of Action
Read the given statement and courses of action carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statement is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given courses of action logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
Road accidents are going to increase day by day.
Courses of Action:
I. Government should start awareness programmes that promote following traffic rules strictly.
II. Government should put a limit on registration of new vehicles.
Read the given statement and courses of action carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statement is true, decide which of the given courses of action logically follows for pursuing.
Statement:
The traffic congestion in the city has significantly increased during peak hours.
Courses of Action:
I. Improve public transportation infrastructure and services to provide viable alternatives to private vehicles.
II. Impose hefty fines on individual drivers during peak hours.
A statement is followed by two courses of action, numbered I and II. You must assume everything in the statement to be true and on the basis of the information given in the statement, decide which of the following course(s) of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.
Statement : Voltage fluctuation in A’s home has damaged many of his new electrical appliances.
Courses of action :
I) A should consult an electrician and install a device to safeguard appliances against fluctuations in voltage.
II) A must replace all the appliances.
Read the given statement(s) and the subsequent course of action carefully and choose which of the following logically follows from the statement(s) for implementation.
Statements:
The African government had decided to declare Ebola as pandemic disease. People are liable to be punished if they do not report Ebola occurring in the family or neighbourhood to the authority.
Course of action:
1. The government should plan to effectively enact laws to control Ebola.
2. Mass media should be used to spread the message about punishment. So that people know about the proceedings.
Read the statement given below and the action taken carefully and select the action which is logical from the given statement.
Statement:
Retired professors, who have worked in the same college, should be included in the advisory committee for college improvement.
Action:
1. Management should take suggestions from its employees.
2. Management should involve experienced persons for the development of the college.
