All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

A rule states that in order to drink beer, one must be over 18 years old. In a bar, there are 4 people. P is 16 years old, Q is 25 years old, R is drinking milkshake and S is drinking a beer. What must be checked to ensure that the rule is being followed?

The correct answer is

Only P’s drink and S’s age

Beer Drinking Rule Analysis

The core of this problem revolves around a specific rule: “in order to drink beer, one must be over 18 years old.” We need to determine what checks are necessary among four individuals (P, Q, R, S) to ensure this rule is being strictly followed in a bar setting.

Rule Enforcement Principles

To effectively check if the rule is being followed, we need to consider two main aspects:

  • Age of Beer Drinkers: If someone is drinking beer, their age must be checked to confirm they are over 18.
  • Drinks of Underage Individuals: If someone is known to be under 18, their drink must be checked to ensure they are not consuming beer.

Individual Person Analysis

Let’s analyze each person based on the given information:

  • P (16 years old): P is 16 years old, which is under the age of 18. According to the rule, P is not allowed to drink beer. Therefore, we must check P’s drink to ensure P is not consuming beer. If P is drinking beer, the rule is being violated.
  • Q (25 years old): Q is 25 years old, which is over the age of 18. Q is legally allowed to drink beer. Whether Q is drinking beer or something else, it does not violate the rule because Q meets the age requirement for beer consumption. So, we do not need to check Q’s drink or age for rule compliance.
  • R (drinking milkshake): R is drinking a milkshake. The rule specifically states “in order to drink beer…” Since R is not drinking beer, the age requirement for beer consumption does not apply to R in this context. Therefore, we do not need to check R’s age for rule compliance related to beer drinking.
  • S (drinking a beer): S is drinking a beer. According to the rule, to drink beer, one must be over 18 years old. To ensure the rule is being followed, we must check S’s age to confirm that S is indeed over 18. If S is under 18, the rule is being violated.

Compliance Summary Table

The following table summarizes the status of each person and what needs to be checked:

Person Known Information Rule Application What Must Be Checked?
P 16 years old (underage) Cannot drink beer. P’s drink (to ensure no beer)
Q 25 years old (of age) Can drink beer or anything else. Nothing (already complies based on age)
R Drinking milkshake Not drinking beer, so age is irrelevant for this rule. Nothing (rule doesn't apply to this drink)
S Drinking a beer Must be over 18. S’s age (to ensure over 18)

Final Compliance Check

Based on our analysis, to ensure the beer drinking rule is being followed, we must check two specific things:

  1. P’s drink, because P is underage (16 years old) and should not be drinking beer.
  2. S’s age, because S is consuming beer and must be over 18 years old to do so.

Therefore, the necessary checks are “Only P’s drink and S’s age”.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Critical Reasoning

  1. 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is a decision based on:

  2. Which of the following is the assumption for the claim that 'Pleasure is desirable'?

  3. Read the given statements carefully and answer the questions.

    Fear of danger is more dangerous than danger itself. Risk is directly proportional= to danger

    Which of the following are true according to the given statements?

    A. Fear is worse than any fearful threat.

    B. There is a trade-off between risk and danger.

    C. There should be fear of danger.

    D. There is no need to take risks to overcome any danger.

  4. A question has been given in this question and a statement related to it. Read the passage carefully and review the statement based on it.

    Amazon has acknowledged the data violation of user names and email ids of some users without giving details of its nature or scope. Although the company has not disclosed the total number of users affected by this violation, it has sent information to all affected users about the technical problem. And now this e-commerce major company is offering Gift Cards as compensation to customers who are victims of their data violation. This e-commerce company headquartered in Seattle is offering Gift Cards between $ 5 to $ 100 for users affected by some of their data violations.

    A publication mentioning email communications between Amazon and a customer Paul Gagnon has reported that when he asked the customer service desk to ask the company how his information was leaked, then the company gave him a promotion of $ 100 Certificate offered. When Gagan got no response for the reason of this violation, he was offered $ 100 as an apology. After this violation, many affected users had filed a complaint with the service desk. Many people affected by this violation complained to the company, but none of them got so far. It is being speculated that Amazon Customer Service Supervisors have been instructed not to offer any comments or any kind of compensation to affected Amazon users.

    Statement: The company has not told the fixed number of people affected by data violation. Select the most suitable option below.

    A-statement is definitely true.

    B-Query is probably true.

    C-statement can not be determined.

    D-statement is completely false.

  5. A question has been given in this question and a statement related to it. Read the passage carefully and review the statement based on it.

    Amazon has acknowledged the data violation of the user name and email id of some of its users, without giving details of its nature or scope. Although the company has not disclosed the total number of users affected by this violation, it has sent information to all affected users about the technical problem. And now this e-commerce major company is offering Gift Cards as compensation to customers who are victims of their data violation. This e-commerce company headquartered in Seattle is offering Gift Cards between $ 5 to $ 100 for users affected by some of their data violations.

    A publication mentioning email communications between Amazon and a customer Paul Gagnon has reported that when he asked the customer service desk to ask the company how his information was leaked, then the company gave him a promotion of $ 100 Certificate offered. When Gagan got no response for the reason of this violation, he was offered $ 100 as an apology. After this violation, many affected users had filed a complaint with the service desk. Many people affected by this violation complained to the company, but none of them got so far. It is being speculated that Amazon Customer Service Supervisors have been instructed not to offer any comments or any kind of compensation to affected Amazon users.

    Statement: Amazon has not instructed its supervisors to not provide any comments or offers of compensation to the affected users.

    Select the most suitable option below.

    A-statement is definitely true.

    B-Query is probably true.

    C-statement can not be determined.

    D-statement is completely false.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App