All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

A price ceiling below the equilibrium price of a commodity leads to

A. Commodity glut in market

B. Shortage of commodity

C. Demand erosion

D. Black marketing

Choose the correct  answer from the options given below:

The correct answer is

B and D only

Understanding Price Ceilings and Market Effects

A price ceiling is a government-imposed limit on how high a price can be charged for a commodity. It is a form of price control. When a price ceiling is set, there are potential effects on the market equilibrium.

Impact of Price Ceiling Below Equilibrium Price

The market reaches equilibrium when the quantity demanded ($\text{Q}_\text{D}$) equals the quantity supplied ($\text{Q}_\text{S}$) at the equilibrium price ($\text{P}_\text{e}$). If a price ceiling ($\text{P}_\text{ceiling}$) is set below the equilibrium price ($\text{P}_\text{ceiling} < \text{P}_\text{e}$), it becomes the maximum legal price. At this lower price, consumers will demand a larger quantity of the commodity than before (as price is lower), while producers will supply a smaller quantity (as the price they receive is lower).

This creates a situation where the quantity demanded significantly exceeds the quantity supplied ($\text{Q}_\text{D} > \text{Q}_\text{S}$).

Analyzing the Consequences of a Price Ceiling Below Equilibrium

Let's examine the potential outcomes listed in the options:

  • A. Commodity glut in market: A commodity glut, or surplus, occurs when the quantity supplied exceeds the quantity demanded ($\text{Q}_\text{S} > \text{Q}_\text{D}$). As explained above, a price ceiling below equilibrium leads to $\text{Q}_\text{D} > \text{Q}_\text{S}$, which is a shortage, not a surplus. Therefore, a commodity glut does not occur.
  • B. Shortage of commodity: A shortage occurs when the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied ($\text{Q}_\text{D} > \text{Q}_\text{S}$). When a price ceiling is set below the equilibrium price, the lower price incentivizes consumers to demand more while discouraging producers from supplying as much. This mismatch between high demand and low supply results in a shortage. This is a likely consequence.
  • C. Demand erosion: Demand erosion would mean a decrease in the quantity demanded at any given price, or a shift in the demand curve. Setting a price ceiling below the equilibrium price makes the commodity cheaper than the market would normally allow. A lower price generally leads to an increase in the quantity demanded, not a decrease or erosion of demand. Therefore, demand erosion is not a direct consequence; in fact, the opposite occurs in terms of quantity demanded at the set price.
  • D. Black marketing: When a significant shortage exists due to a price ceiling below equilibrium, some consumers who cannot obtain the commodity at the legal price may be willing to pay more. Suppliers (or middlemen) may seize this opportunity to sell the scarce commodity illegally at prices above the price ceiling. This illegal market is known as a black market. Black marketing is a common consequence of effective price ceilings that cause shortages.

Identifying the Correct Outcomes

Based on the analysis, a price ceiling set below the equilibrium price primarily leads to a shortage of the commodity (B) and can encourage the development of black marketing (D) due to the shortage and frustrated demand.

Looking at the options provided:

  • Option 1: A and D only (Incorrect, A is wrong)
  • Option 2: A and B only (Incorrect, A is wrong)
  • Option 3: B and C only (Incorrect, C is wrong)
  • Option 4: B and D only (Correct, B and D are correct consequences)

Revision Table: Price Ceiling Below Equilibrium

Condition Price Ceiling Set Below Equilibrium ($\text{P}_\text{ceiling} < \text{P}_\text{e}$)
Effect on Quantity Demanded ($\text{Q}_\text{D}$) Increases (relative to $\text{Q}_\text{D}$ at $\text{P}_\text{e}$)
Effect on Quantity Supplied ($\text{Q}_\text{S}$) Decreases (relative to $\text{Q}_\text{S}$ at $\text{P}_\text{e}$)
Market Outcome Shortage ($\text{Q}_\text{D} > \text{Q}_\text{S}$)
Potential Secondary Effects Black marketing, queues/waiting lists, reduced quality, favoritism/rationing

Additional Information: Market Interventions

Government intervention in markets through price controls like price ceilings and price floors can have significant unintended consequences. While price ceilings are often implemented to protect consumers by keeping prices low for essential goods, if set below the equilibrium, they distort market signals, leading to shortages, inefficiency, and potentially illegal markets. Similarly, price floors (minimum prices) set above the equilibrium can lead to surpluses.

Understanding the concepts of supply, demand, and equilibrium is crucial for analyzing the effects of such interventions. The market naturally moves towards equilibrium where supply and demand balance. Price controls prevent this natural adjustment, forcing the market into a state of disequilibrium (either shortage or surplus).

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Price determination under different market forms

  1. The demand curve that a firm faces in a perfectly competitive market is perfectly _______________ ; it is a _____________straight line at the market price.

  2. For a monopolist, profit is maximized at that level of output where:

  3. When the maximum price is fixed below the equilibrium price, which of the following occurs as a result?

    Excess supply

    Excess demand

    Black marketing

  4. Given below are two statements, one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R

    Assertion A: An oligopolist firm cannot decide the price it wishes to charge as well as the quantity it wishes to sell, both at the same time.

    Reason R: An oligopolist firm takes into consideration the competitor's actions and counter actions because of a strong interdependence among the competitive firms

    In light of the above statements, choose the  most appropriate  answer form the options given below

  5. Firm A acquirers firm B. Market price of shares of B is Rs. 20 per share and EPS is Rs. 5. For an exchange ratio of 1.5 ∶ 1, what was the P/E ratio used in acquiring firm B ?

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App