A figure of speech in which a qualifying adjective is sometimes transferred from a person to a thing or from one word to another, to which it does not strictly belong, is called
Transferred Epithet
Figures of speech are literary devices that use words in a non-literal way to create a particular effect. They add colour, impact, and clarity to language by making comparisons, associations, or by transferring qualities from one thing to another. Identifying different figures of speech helps in understanding the deeper meaning and style of writing.
The question describes a figure of speech where an adjective, which normally qualifies one noun (often a person), is moved or "transferred" to another related noun (often a thing) to which it doesn't strictly or logically belong, but makes sense in context.
Let's look at some examples to understand this figure of speech, known as Transferred Epithet:
In all these examples, the adjective logically describes a person's state or quality, but it is applied to a related object or concept. This perfectly matches the description provided in the question about a qualifying adjective being transferred from a person to a thing or one word to another.
Therefore, the figure of speech defined is indeed the Transferred Epithet.
Let's briefly look at the other options to understand why they do not fit the description given in the question:
Based on the clear definitions, none of Metonymy, Apostrophe, or Personification match the specific mechanism described in the question, which is the transfer of a qualifying adjective. Only Transferred Epithet fits this description accurately.
The figure of speech where an adjective is transferred from what it logically describes (often a person) to a closely associated thing or concept is called a Transferred Epithet. This is a common literary device used to add depth and evoke feeling, applying a quality of a person or subject to an object connected to them. The examples and definitions provided demonstrate why Transferred Epithet is the correct identification for the figure of speech described in the question.
Match List-I with List-II:
| List-I | List-II |
|---|---|
| (A) Meghe Dhaka Tara | (I) Govind Nihalani |
| (B) Garam Hawa | (II) Habib Tanvir |
| (C) Tamas | (III) Ritvik Ghatak |
| (D) Jis Lahore Nahin Vekhya O Jamya-e-nai | (IV) M.S. Sathyu |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Which of the following statements are correct?
(A) Mahabharata has over 1,00,000 verses.
(B) Mahabharata was written by Valmiki.
(C) V.S. Sukthankar is associated with the critical edition of Mahabharata.
(D) The critical edition of Mahabharata took 47 years to complete.
(E) The critical edition of Mahabharata ran into over 13,000 pages.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below :
Who wrote the essay "Naipaul's India and Mine" (1984) as a reply to V.S. Naipaul's An Area of Darkness ?
Identify the one that has not been paired correctly.
Which of the following Articles of the Indian Constitution made the provision for use of English, alongside Hindi, for official purposes, for fifteen years?