CEED 2026 syllabus totals 250 marks, not the 200 that circulates on a lot of pages. IIT Bombay conducts CEED 2026 for admission to M.Des and PhD design programmes, with Part A worth 150 marks through NAT, MSQ, and MCQ questions, and Part B worth 100 marks across 5 separate questions, not one combined drawing task. The MCQ penalty in CEED is also different from its sister exam UCEED, since the two are built around similar formats but use different exact deductions. Clearing CEED does not grant a seat directly either, since every participating institute runs its own additional interview or portfolio round afterward. This page covers the real Part A topic areas, Part B's five distinct questions, the exact marking scheme, and the official syllabus source.
CEED decides admission to Master of Design and PhD programmes at IIT Bombay, IIT Delhi, IIT Guwahati, IIT Hyderabad, IIT Kanpur, and IISc Bangalore, and a candidate can attempt it a maximum of two consecutive times.
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Exam Name | Common Entrance Examination for Design (CEED) |
| Conducting Body | IIT Bombay |
| Courses Offered | M.Des, PhD in Design |
| Total Marks | 250 (Part A 150, Part B 100) |
| Duration | 3 hours (Part A 1 hour, Part B 2 hours) |
| Part A Mode | Computer-based |
| Part B Mode | Offline, pen and paper, 5 questions |
| Part B Evaluation | Only for candidates who clear the Part A cut-off |
| Admission Route | CEED score plus a separate institute-level interview or portfolio round |
| Official Syllabus Source | ceed.iitb.ac.in |
A frequently repeated figure describes CEED as a 200-mark exam split evenly across Part A and Part B, and this understates Part A specifically. Part A actually carries 150 marks, built from 3 sections whose marks add up beyond the rounder 100 that gets quoted elsewhere. Part B stays at 100 marks. Together, the two parts add up to 250, not 200. This matters beyond just getting a number right, since a candidate estimating their likely score using the wrong total ends up with a percentage that looks stronger or weaker than it actually is. A score of 150 out of a wrongly assumed 200 looks like 75%, while the same 150 out of the real 250 is only 60%, a meaningful difference when comparing against past cutoffs.
MSQ questions use a graded partial marking system, and the MCQ penalty in CEED is smaller than the one used in UCEED, its sister exam at the same institute.
| Question Type | Marking Rule |
|---|---|
| NAT (Numerical Answer Type) | +4 correct, no negative or partial marking |
| MSQ, all correct options chosen | +4 |
| MSQ, all 4 correct but only 3 chosen | +3 |
| MSQ, 3 or more correct but only 2 chosen | +2 |
| MSQ, any incorrect option chosen | -1 |
| MCQ (Multiple Choice Questions) | +3 correct, -0.5 incorrect |
| Part B (5 questions) | 20 marks each, no negative marking |
This 0.5-mark MCQ penalty is noticeably lighter than UCEED's 0.71, so a candidate moving between the two exams should not assume identical risk tolerance for careless guessing carries over unchanged.
CEED Part A covers 6 broad areas, and questions frequently blend two or more of these areas within a single question rather than testing them in isolation.
This area in CEED's Part A tests mental manipulation of shapes rather than describing them in words.
| Topic Group | Key Focus |
|---|---|
| 2D and 3D Transformation | Rotating, folding, and reassembling shapes mentally |
| Spatial Relationships | How objects relate to each other in physical space |
This CEED area is built around noticing overlooked details in familiar visual scenes rather than raw creativity.
| Topic Group | Key Focus |
|---|---|
| Hidden Properties | Spotting concealed or unusual details in an image |
| Design Elements | Recognising form, texture, and visual composition choices |
This CEED area connects design to broader context, testing awareness rather than technical design skill directly.
| Topic Group | Key Focus |
|---|---|
| Environmental Issues | Sustainability and ecological awareness relevant to design |
| Culture and Society | How social and cultural context shapes design choices |
This is the most conventional reasoning section within CEED's Part A, closer to a standard aptitude paper.
| Topic Group | Key Focus |
|---|---|
| Pattern Recognition | Series, analogies, and logical sequences |
| Problem-Solving | Structured deduction from given information |
Language testing in CEED stays functional, focused on comprehension speed rather than literary knowledge.
| Topic Group | Key Focus |
|---|---|
| Vocabulary | Word meaning and usage in context |
| Comprehension | Understanding a passage accurately under time pressure |
This CEED area leans closer to postgraduate-level design reasoning than the more general aptitude testing found in the other 5 areas.
| Topic Group | Key Focus |
|---|---|
| User-Centric Design | Thinking through a design problem from the user's perspective |
| Innovation Concepts | Applying design thinking to propose a workable idea |
CEED's Part B is often summarised as a single drawing and design section, when it actually consists of 5 separate compulsory questions.
| Question Focus | What It Tests |
|---|---|
| Sketching | Line quality, proportion, and representation through drawing |
| Creativity | Original idea generation and imaginative thinking |
| Form Sensitivity | Understanding shape, structure, and physical form |
| Visual Sensitivity | Composition, balance, and visual judgement |
| Problem Identification | Framing a design scenario and proposing a solution |
Each of the 5 questions carries 20 marks, and a candidate strong at sketching but weak at problem identification will still lose real marks on the questions built specifically around that gap. Since these questions test clearly different abilities, preparation built entirely around rendering technique leaves real marks on the table in the more conceptual questions.
CEED follows the same rule UCEED uses for its own Part B, since both exams are conducted by IIT Bombay:
Clearing CEED 2026 does not by itself secure a seat, unlike some undergraduate entrance exams that flow directly into a seat allocation round.
The official CEED information brochure remains the safest source for exact topic-level detail:
| Relevant Links | |
|---|---|
| CEED Question Paper 2026 | |
| CEED Question Paper 2025 |
Ques: Is CEED Part A really worth only 100 marks?
Ans: No. Part A is worth 150 marks, built from NAT, MSQ, and MCQ sections. A figure of 100 marks understates it, and the correct combined total across both parts is 250, not 200.
Ques: Does CEED Part B have just one drawing question?
Ans: No. Part B has 5 separate compulsory questions covering Sketching, Creativity, Form Sensitivity, Visual Sensitivity, and Problem Identification, each worth 20 marks.
Ques: Is the MCQ negative marking the same in CEED and UCEED?
Ans: No. CEED deducts 0.5 marks for an incorrect MCQ, while UCEED deducts 0.71 marks. The two exams share a similar structure but use different exact penalties.
Ques: Does qualifying CEED guarantee admission to an IIT's M.Des programme?
Ans: No. A qualifying CEED score only makes a candidate eligible to apply to participating institutes. Each institute runs its own separate interview or portfolio round before making a final decision.
Ques: Can a PwD candidate use a scribe for the drawing questions in Part B?
Ans: No. Scribe assistance is not permitted for Part B in either CEED or UCEED, since these questions are specifically designed to test a candidate's own drawing and design skill.
Download the PREPP App and attempt FREE CEED Mock Tests and get complete study material!
Comments